185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27226519)
1. Comparison of Eligibility Criteria Between Protocols, Registries, and Publications of Cancer Clinical Trials.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W; Tannock I
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Nov; 108(11):. PubMed ID: 27226519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles.
Blümle A; Meerpohl JJ; Rücker G; Antes G; Schumacher M; von Elm E
BMJ; 2011 Apr; 342():d1828. PubMed ID: 21467104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():87-94. PubMed ID: 28757260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of noninferiority margins reported in protocols and publications showed incomplete and inconsistent reporting.
Dekkers OM; Cevallos M; Bührer J; Poncet A; Ackermann Rau S; Perneger TV; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 25450451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eligibility criteria for HIV clinical trials and generalizability of results: the gap between published reports and study protocols.
Gandhi M; Ameli N; Bacchetti P; Sharp GB; French AL; Young M; Gange SJ; Anastos K; Holman S; Levine A; Greenblatt RM
AIDS; 2005 Nov; 19(16):1885-96. PubMed ID: 16227797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials.
Perlmutter AS; Tran VT; Dechartres A; Ravaud P
Ann Oncol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 28011448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Registration status and outcome reporting of trials published in core headache medicine journals.
Rayhill ML; Sharon R; Burch R; Loder E
Neurology; 2015 Nov; 85(20):1789-94. PubMed ID: 26475691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(20):2457-65. PubMed ID: 15161896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancies in endpoints between clinical trial protocols and clinical trial registration in randomized trials in oncology.
Serpas VJ; Raghav KP; Halperin DM; Yao J; Overman MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):169. PubMed ID: 30541475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolution in the eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials for systemic cancer therapies.
Srikanthan A; Vera-Badillo F; Ethier J; Goldstein R; Templeton AJ; Ocana A; Seruga B; Amir E
Cancer Treat Rev; 2016 Feb; 43():67-73. PubMed ID: 26827694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of reports in surgery journals.
Rosenthal R; Dwan K
Ann Surg; 2013 Jun; 257(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 23478520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing patient eligibility criteria in cancer clinical trials.
George SL
J Clin Oncol; 1996 Apr; 14(4):1364-70. PubMed ID: 8648395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
Rongen JJ; Hannink G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Mathieu S; Boutron I; Moher D; Altman DG; Ravaud P
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 19724045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eligibility criteria in randomized phase II and III adjuvant and neoadjuvant breast cancer trials: not a significant barrier to enrollment.
Filion M; Forget G; Brochu O; Provencher L; Desbiens C; Doyle C; Poirier B; DuRocher M; Camden S; Lemieux J
Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 23060323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory.
Hróbjartsson A; Pildal J; Chan AW; Haahr MT; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):967-73. PubMed ID: 19635403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes to design and analysis elements of research plans during randomised controlled trials in Australia.
Coskinas X; Simes RJ; Martin AJ
Med J Aust; 2022 Nov; 217(10):526-531. PubMed ID: 36089816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Making protocols available with the article improved evaluation of selective outcome reporting.
Calméjane L; Dechartres A; Tran VT; Ravaud P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():95-102. PubMed ID: 30196127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
