These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27226787)

  • 1. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.
    Callewaert G; Bosteels J; Housmans S; Verguts J; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Van der Aa F; De Ridder D; Vergote I; Deprest J
    Gynecol Surg; 2016; 13():115-123. PubMed ID: 27226787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: efficiency of robotic assistance compared to standard laparoscopy.
    Evangelopoulos N; Nessi A; Achtari C
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 38340232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Gouveia De Sa M; Claydon LS; Whitlow B; Dolcet Artahona MA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 26249235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Anger JT; Mueller ER; Tarnay C; Smith B; Stroupe K; Rosenman A; Brubaker L; Bresee C; Kenton K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 123(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24463657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Therapeutic effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Yin H; Zeng F; Xue M; Tian X
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Jun; 45(6):709-714. PubMed ID: 32879129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bi-centre prospective cohort study.
    van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; O'Sullivan OE; Lenters E; Broeders I; O'Reilly BA
    BJOG; 2019 Jul; 126(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 30924606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative analysis of the HUGO
    Collà Ruvolo C; Afonina M; Balestrazzi E; Paciotti M; Piro A; Piramide F; Bravi CA; Peraire Lores M; Sorce G; Belmonte M; Rebuffo S; Ticonosco M; Frego N; Gaia G; De Groote R; Mottrie A; De Naeyer G
    Int J Med Robot; 2023 Oct; ():e2587. PubMed ID: 37864367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J; He Y; Zhang X; Wang Z; Zuo X; Gao L; Hong L
    Ann Transl Med; 2021 Mar; 9(6):449. PubMed ID: 33850846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for managing pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Yang SS; Chang SJ
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1037-1045. PubMed ID: 34779989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Alas AN; Anger JT
    Curr Urol Rep; 2015 May; 16(5):33. PubMed ID: 25874589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy with hinotori, a brand-new surgical robot system produced in Japan; report of initial clinical case series.
    Ichino M; Sasaki H; Takenaka M; Zennami K; Takahara K; Shiroki R
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Oct; 17(4):e13380. PubMed ID: 39187427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abdominal approaches to pelvic prolapse repairs.
    Pollard ME; Eilber KS; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 23673511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.