These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27227104)
1. A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy. Aadam AA; Wani S; Amick A; Shah JN; Bhat YM; Hamerski CM; Klapman JB; Muthusamy VR; Watson RR; Rademaker AW; Keswani RN; Keefer L; Das A; Komanduri S Endosc Int Open; 2016 May; 4(5):E497-505. PubMed ID: 27227104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial. Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study. Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions. Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial. Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center. Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses. de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle biopsy with histology specimen processing. Ku L; Shahshahan MA; Hou LA; Eysselein VE; Reicher S World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Aug; 12(8):212-219. PubMed ID: 32879656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study. Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy. Sweeney J; Soong L; Goyal A Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study. Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next-generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and FNB. Gan Q; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Duose DY; Stewart JM; Coronel E; Bhutani MS; Lee JH; Weston B; Ge PS; Ross WA; Maitra A Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Apr; 130(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 34905283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance: a prospective cohort study. Temnykh LM; Rahal MA; Zia Z; Al-Haddad MA Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2020 Oct; 8(5):349-354. PubMed ID: 33163189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy. Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]