461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27227756)
21. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for characterizing focal hepatic lesions: Correlation with lesion enhancement.
Choi IY; Lee SS; Sung YS; Cheong H; Lee H; Byun JH; Kim SY; Lee SJ; Shin YM; Lee MG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 27664970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hepatic neuroendocrine tumour: Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker of prognosis associated with tumour grade and overall survival.
Min JH; Kang TW; Kim YK; Kim SH; Shin KS; Lee JE; Ha SY; Sohn I
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2561-2571. PubMed ID: 29368162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Non-small cell lung cancer: Whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient for assessment of tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion and pleural invasion.
Tsuchiya N; Doai M; Usuda K; Uramoto H; Tonami H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172433. PubMed ID: 28207858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: prediction of the histologic grade using pure diffusion coefficient and tumor size.
Hwang EJ; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kim JH; Han JK; Choi BI; Lee KB; Jang JY; Kim SW; Nickel MD; Kiefer B
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 24500090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Zhao T; Liang X; Niu C; Ding C
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28696169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Biomarkers for Assessment of Response With Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: Comparison of the Measurements of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases (NETLM) With Various MR Sequences and at Multiple Phases of Contrast Administration.
Luersen GF; Wei W; Tamm EP; Bhosale PR; Szklaruk J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 27636124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative comparison of MR diffusion-weighted imaging for liver focal lesions between 3.0T and 1.5T: Regions of interest of the minimum-spot ADC, the largest possible solid part, and the maximum diameter in lesions.
Tang Y; Wang H; Wang Y; Li J; Jia R; Ma L; Ye H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1320-1329. PubMed ID: 27080350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is the combination of MR and CT findings useful in determining the tumor grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?
Toshima F; Inoue D; Komori T; Yoshida K; Yoneda N; Minami T; Matsui O; Ikeda H; Gabata T
Jpn J Radiol; 2017 May; 35(5):242-253. PubMed ID: 28258323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms at magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between grade 3 and grade 1/2 tumors.
Guo C; Chen X; Xiao W; Wang Q; Sun K; Wang Z
Onco Targets Ther; 2017; 10():1465-1474. PubMed ID: 28331340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Magnetic resonance imaging features according to grade and stage.
De Robertis R; Cingarlini S; Tinazzi Martini P; Ortolani S; Butturini G; Landoni L; Regi P; Girelli R; Capelli P; Gobbo S; Tortora G; Scarpa A; Pederzoli P; D'Onofrio M
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan; 23(2):275-285. PubMed ID: 28127201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Suo S; Zhang K; Cao M; Suo X; Hua J; Geng X; Chen J; Zhuang Z; Ji X; Lu Q; Wang H; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 26343918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prediction of the histopathologic findings of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: qualitative and quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted imaging.
Lewis S; Besa C; Wagner M; Jhaveri K; Kihira S; Zhu H; Sadoughi N; Fischer S; Srivastava A; Yee E; Mortele K; Babb J; Thung S; Taouli B
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):2047-2057. PubMed ID: 29234913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic parameters of endometrioid carcinoma.
Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 24339027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging--accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade.
Takeuchi M; Sasaki S; Ito M; Okada S; Takahashi S; Kawai T; Suzuki K; Oshima H; Hara M; Shibamoto Y
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 19332849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Whole-lesion histogram analysis metrics of the apparent diffusion coefficient: a correlation study with histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Xu YS; Liu HF; Xi DL; Li JK; Liu Z; Yan RF; Lei JQ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Sep; 44(9):3089-3098. PubMed ID: 31256226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Characterization of Liver Tumors by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance Using the Mean and Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.
Namimoto T; Nakagawa M; Kizaki Y; Itatani R; Kidoh M; Utsunomiya D; Oda S; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 25836022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative analysis of the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating the histological features of endometrial cancer.
Yue W; Meng N; Wang J; Liu W; Wang X; Yan M; Han D; Cheng J
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Feb; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 30764876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diffusion volume (DV) measurement in endometrial and cervical cancer: A new MRI parameter in the evaluation of the tumor grading and the risk classification.
Mainenti PP; Pizzuti LM; Segreto S; Comerci M; Fronzo S; Romano F; Crisci V; Smaldone M; Laccetti E; Storto G; Alfano B; Maurea S; Salvatore M; Pace L
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 26724655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
