1365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27228511)
21. A randomized, double-blind controlled trial of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in central spinal stenosis: 2-year follow-up.
Manchikanti L; Cash KA; McManus CD; Damron KS; Pampati V; Falco FJ
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 25675062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results.
Nunley PD; Patel VV; Orndorff DG; Lavelle WF; Block JE; Geisler FH
World Neurosurg; 2017 Aug; 104():279-283. PubMed ID: 28479526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative study of 2-year follow-up outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with physical therapy alone and those with surgical intervention after less successful physical therapy.
Minetama M; Kawakami M; Nakagawa M; Ishimoto Y; Nagata K; Fukui D; Sumiya T; Kitagawa T; Miyake T; Yamamoto Y; Sakon N; Matsuoka T; Nakagawa Y
J Orthop Sci; 2018 May; 23(3):470-476. PubMed ID: 29395806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Understanding whether chronic lower back pain patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from multiple epidural steroid injections prior to the
Pryzbylkowski P; Bux A; Chandwani K; Khemlani V; Puri S; Rosenberg J; Sukumaran H
Pain Manag; 2022 Apr; 12(3):261-266. PubMed ID: 34751594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.
Moojen WA; Arts MP; Brand R; Koes BW; Peul WC
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 May; 11():100. PubMed ID: 20507568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from decompression of levels with adjacent moderate stenosis? A prospective cohort study from the NORDSTEN study.
Tronstad S; Haug KJ; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Franssen E; Indrekvam K; Solberg T; Hermansen E
Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 38266826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical Outcomes in Neurogenic Claudication Using a Multimodal Program for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Study of 49 Patients With Prospective Long-term Follow-up.
Chow NW; Southerst D; Wong JJ; Kopansky-Giles D; Ammendolia C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2019; 42(3):203-209. PubMed ID: 31029469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrospective review of patient self-reported improvement and post-procedure findings for mild (minimally invasive lumbar decompression).
Lingreen R; Grider JS
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 21102968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Nunley PD; Patel VV; Orndorff DG; Lavelle WF; Block JE; Geisler FH
Clin Interv Aging; 2017; 12():1409-1417. PubMed ID: 28919727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Two-Year Evaluation of the X-STOP Interspinous Spacer in Different Primary Patient Populations With Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Because of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Hartjen CA; Resnick DK; Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Hsu EH; Skidmore GA
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):305-11. PubMed ID: 23168396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression.
Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug; 165(8):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 37407851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study.
Soliman MAR; Ali A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E3. PubMed ID: 31042649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression for LSS: two-year outcomes.
Chopko BW
Clin J Pain; 2013 Nov; 29(11):939-43. PubMed ID: 23446067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Supervised physical therapy vs. home exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Minetama M; Kawakami M; Teraguchi M; Kagotani R; Mera Y; Sumiya T; Nakagawa M; Yamamoto Y; Matsuo S; Koike Y; Sakon N; Nakatani T; Kitano T; Nakagawa Y
Spine J; 2019 Aug; 19(8):1310-1318. PubMed ID: 30986577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.
Moojen WA; Arts MP; Jacobs WC; van Zwet EW; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Koes BW; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6415. PubMed ID: 24231273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis secondary to ligamentum flavum hypertrophy using percutaneous endoscopy through interlaminar approach: a retrospective study.
Liu Y; Qi Y; Diaty DM; Zheng G; Shen X; Lin S; Chen J; Song Y; Gu X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Aug; 15(1):337. PubMed ID: 32811508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mild procedure for lumbar decompression: a review.
Chen H; Kelling J
Pain Pract; 2013 Feb; 13(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 22726247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
