252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27229104)
1. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of surgical approach on short-term oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
Midura EF; Hanseman DJ; Hoehn RS; Davis BR; Abbott DE; Shah SA; Paquette IM
Surgery; 2015 Aug; 158(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 25999253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after rectal surgery: The Italian experience.
Spolverato G; Gennaro N; Zorzi M; Rugge M; Mescoli C; Saugo M; Corti MC; Pucciarelli S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1219-1224. PubMed ID: 30904244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer.
Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Takahashi S; Yoshida E; Hakamada K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 21 Suppl 3():S422-8. PubMed ID: 24562938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oncologic outcomes for low rectal adenocarcinoma following low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis versus abdominoperineal resection: a National Cancer Database propensity matched analysis.
Fields AC; Scully RE; Saadat LV; Lu P; Davids JS; Bleday R; Goldberg JE; Melnitchouk N
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 34(5):843-848. PubMed ID: 30790033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.
de'Angelis N; Landi F; Vitali GC; Memeo R; Martínez-Pérez A; Solis A; Assalino M; Vallribera F; Mercoli HA; Marescaux J; Mutter D; Ris F; Espin E; Brunetti F
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3106-3121. PubMed ID: 27826780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer provides a shorter length of hospital stay while not affecting the recurrence or survival: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Odermatt M; Flashman K; Khan J; Parvaiz A
Surg Today; 2016 Jul; 46(7):798-806. PubMed ID: 26342816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive versus open intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: long-term oncologic outcomes.
Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11001. PubMed ID: 34040037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
