These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27229104)

  • 1. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
    Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
    J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
    Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of surgical approach on short-term oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
    Midura EF; Hanseman DJ; Hoehn RS; Davis BR; Abbott DE; Shah SA; Paquette IM
    Surgery; 2015 Aug; 158(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 25999253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after rectal surgery: The Italian experience.
    Spolverato G; Gennaro N; Zorzi M; Rugge M; Mescoli C; Saugo M; Corti MC; Pucciarelli S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1219-1224. PubMed ID: 30904244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
    Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
    J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
    Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer.
    Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Takahashi S; Yoshida E; Hakamada K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 21 Suppl 3():S422-8. PubMed ID: 24562938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oncologic outcomes for low rectal adenocarcinoma following low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis versus abdominoperineal resection: a National Cancer Database propensity matched analysis.
    Fields AC; Scully RE; Saadat LV; Lu P; Davids JS; Bleday R; Goldberg JE; Melnitchouk N
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 34(5):843-848. PubMed ID: 30790033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.
    de'Angelis N; Landi F; Vitali GC; Memeo R; Martínez-Pérez A; Solis A; Assalino M; Vallribera F; Mercoli HA; Marescaux J; Mutter D; Ris F; Espin E; Brunetti F
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3106-3121. PubMed ID: 27826780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer provides a shorter length of hospital stay while not affecting the recurrence or survival: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Odermatt M; Flashman K; Khan J; Parvaiz A
    Surg Today; 2016 Jul; 46(7):798-806. PubMed ID: 26342816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive versus open intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11001. PubMed ID: 34040037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.