These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

29 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2722915)

  • 1. Partisan niche construction: Out-party affect, geographic sorting, and mate selection.
    Arreguin C
    Politics Life Sci; 2023 Nov; 42(2):254-276. PubMed ID: 37987571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partner choice, confounding and trait convergence all contribute to phenotypic partner similarity.
    Sjaarda J; Kutalik Z
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 May; 7(5):776-789. PubMed ID: 36928782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relaxed Observance of Traditional Marriage Rules Allows Social Connectivity without Loss of Genetic Diversity.
    Guillot EG; Hazelton ML; Karafet TM; Lansing JS; Sudoyo H; Cox MP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Sep; 32(9):2254-62. PubMed ID: 25968961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Equilibrium population dynamics when mating is by mutual choice based on age.
    Alpern S; Katrantzi I; Ramsey D
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Jun; 94():63-72. PubMed ID: 23541396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mate choice and human stature: homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mating preferences.
    Courtiol A; Raymond M; Godelle B; Ferdy JB
    Evolution; 2010 Aug; 64(8):2189-203. PubMed ID: 20199563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jul; 111(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 27337140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Homogamy and imprinting-like effect on mate choice preference for body height in the current Japanese population.
    Seki M; Ihara Y; Aoki K
    Ann Hum Biol; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22136396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The consequences of heterogamy and homogamy on the similarity between spouses.
    Tomlinson I
    J Biosoc Sci; 1989 Apr; 21(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 2722915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mate selection in man: evidence, theory, and outcome.
    Epstein E; Guttman R
    Soc Biol; 1984; 31(3-4):243-78. PubMed ID: 6400148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of mate choice: a dialogue between theory and experiment.
    Roff DA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Dec; 1360():1-15. PubMed ID: 25906973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: a review.
    Havlicek J; Roberts SC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2009 May; 34(4):497-512. PubMed ID: 19054623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.