315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27229310)
1. Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory.
Dowling NM; Bolt DM; Deng S; Li C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():63. PubMed ID: 27229310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extreme Response Style and the Measurement of Intra-Individual Variability in Affect.
Deng S; E McCarthy D; E Piper M; B Baker T; Bolt DM
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(2):199-218. PubMed ID: 29324049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation on types of invariance in studying extreme response bias with an IRTree approach.
Jeon M; De Boeck P
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 31292952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Simulation Study on Methods of Correcting for the Effects of Extreme Response Style.
Wetzel E; Böhnke JR; Rose N
Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Apr; 76(2):304-324. PubMed ID: 29795867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. www.common-metrics.org: a web application to estimate scores from different patient-reported outcome measures on a common scale.
Fischer HF; Rose M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):142. PubMed ID: 27760525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PROs in the wild: Assessing the validity of patient reported outcomes in an electronic registry.
Cabitza F; Dui LG; Banfi G
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Nov; 181():104837. PubMed ID: 30709564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.
Huang HY
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1706. PubMed ID: 27853444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correcting for Extreme Response Style: Model Choice Matters.
Schoenmakers M; Tijmstra J; Vermunt J; Bolsinova M
Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Feb; 84(1):145-170. PubMed ID: 38250509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.
Coons SJ; Gwaltney CJ; Hays RD; Lundy JJ; Sloan JA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Cella D; Basch E;
Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 19900250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combining mixture distribution and multidimensional IRTree models for the measurement of extreme response styles.
Khorramdel L; von Davier M; Pokropek A
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):538-559. PubMed ID: 31385610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry.
Ayilara OF; Zhang L; Sajobi TT; Sawatzky R; Bohm E; Lix LM
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Jun; 17(1):106. PubMed ID: 31221151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Achieving valid patient-reported outcomes measurement: a lesson from fatigue in multiple sclerosis.
Hobart J; Cano S; Baron R; Thompson A; Schwid S; Zajicek J; Andrich D
Mult Scler; 2013 Nov; 19(13):1773-83. PubMed ID: 23574800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.
Wetzel E; Lüdtke O; Zettler I; Böhnke JR
Assessment; 2016 Jun; 23(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 25986062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
Meredith W; Teresi JA
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the impact of calibration of patient-reported outcomes measures on results from randomized clinical trials: a simulation study based on Rasch measurement theory.
Loubert A; Regnault A; Sébille V; Hardouin JB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):224. PubMed ID: 35962310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Checklist to operationalize measurement characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures.
Francis DO; McPheeters ML; Noud M; Penson DF; Feurer ID
Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 5(1):129. PubMed ID: 27484996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
