These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2722940)

  • 1. Torsional stability of the femoral component of hip arthroplasty. Response to an anteriorly applied load.
    Nunn D; Freeman MA; Tanner KE; Bonfield W
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1989 May; 71(3):452-5. PubMed ID: 2722940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loosening of cementless femoral stems: a biomechanical analysis of immediate fixation with loading vertical, femur horizontal.
    Phillips TW; Nguyen LT; Munro SD
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 2026632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examination of rotational fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. A mechanical study of micromovement and acoustic emission.
    Sugiyama H; Whiteside LA; Kaiser AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):122-8. PubMed ID: 2582663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
    Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle.
    Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint.
    Bartz RL; Nobel PC; Kadakia NR; Tullos HS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1300-7. PubMed ID: 11005521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length.
    Wilson LJ; Roe JA; Pearcy MJ; Crawford RW
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):934-9. PubMed ID: 22146384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component.
    Watanabe Y; Shiba N; Matsuo S; Higuchi F; Tagawa Y; Inoue A
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 10884212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rotational movement of femoral components of total hip replacements in response to an anteriorly applied load.
    Tanner KE; Bonfield W; Nunn D; Freeman MA
    Eng Med; 1988 Jul; 17(3):127-9. PubMed ID: 3181590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of neck resection on torsional stability of cementless total hip replacement.
    Whiteside LA; White SE; McCarthy DS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1995 Oct; 24(10):766-70. PubMed ID: 8593558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A biomechanical study of the Birmingham mid head resection arthroplasty: effect of stem size on femoral neck fracture.
    Aghayan S; Shepherd DE; Davis ET
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Aug; 227(8):913-8. PubMed ID: 23636766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary stability in cementless femoral stems: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis.
    Götze C; Steens W; Vieth V; Poremba C; Claes L; Steinbeck J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2002 May; 17(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 12034119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A biomechanical comparison of epiphyseal versus metaphyseal fixed bone-conserving hip arthroplasty.
    Olsen M; Sellan M; Zdero R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():122-7. PubMed ID: 21543701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: two-year radiostereometric and bone densitometric evaluation in 50 hips.
    Sköldenberg OG; Salemyr MO; Bodén HS; Lundberg A; Ahl TE; Adolphson PY
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 May; 93(5):665-77. PubMed ID: 21511934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
    Wik TS
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel locking screw hip stem to achieve immediate stability in total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical study.
    Grechenig S; Gueorguiev B; Berner A; Heiss P; Müller M; Nerlich M; Schmitz P
    Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S83-7. PubMed ID: 26542871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
    Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Biomechanical experiment of non-stemmed anatomical total hip prosthesis arthroplasty in vitro].
    Fei Q; Hong S; Chen T; Chen Z; Qian B
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 22(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 15762127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.
    Richards CJ; Giannitsios D; Huk OL; Zukor DJ; Steffen T; Antoniou J
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():96-101. PubMed ID: 18676943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.