144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27229529)
21. Value of retrospective fusion of PET and MR images in detection of hepatic metastases: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
Donati OF; Hany TF; Reiner CS; von Schulthess GK; Marincek B; Seifert B; Weishaupt D
J Nucl Med; 2010 May; 51(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 20395324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic focal lesions: dynamic contrastographic evaluation with gadolinium versus reticulo-endothelial hepato-specific contrast media].
Di Cesare E; Cariello G; Barile A; Sabatini M; Michelini O; Erriquez D; Masciocchi C
Radiol Med; 2000 Oct; 100(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 11155451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prevalence of hepatic lesion types defined by T2-weighted and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in patients with metastasized neuroendocrine tumors.
Milin S; Brunaud L; Orry X; Bastien C; Klein M; Bresler L; Laurent V
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2132-2141. PubMed ID: 27315078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of image registration in subtracted 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of treated hepatocellular carcinoma.
Sundarakumar DK; Wilson GJ; Osman SF; Zaidi SF; Maki JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 25615750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characterization of liver metastases: the efficacy of biphasic magnetic resonance imaging with ferucarbotran-enhancement.
Hong HS; Byun JH; Won HJ; Kim KW; Lee SS; Lee MG; Yun SC
Clin Radiol; 2010 Sep; 65(9):701-7. PubMed ID: 20696297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: evaluation of the effect in signal intensity after Gd-EOB-DTPA enhancement.
Tamada T; Ito K; Yoshida K; Sone T; Murakami K; Kanki A; Watanabe S; Higashi H; Yamashita T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 20351500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of a known breast cancer using an abbreviated breast MRI protocol: Correlation of imaging characteristics and pathology with lesion detection and conspicuity.
Heacock L; Melsaether AN; Heller SL; Gao Y; Pysarenko KM; Babb JS; Kim SG; Moy L
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):815-23. PubMed ID: 26971429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Whole-body MRI for metastases screening: a preliminary study using 3D VIBE sequences with automatic subtraction between noncontrast and contrast enhanced images.
Thomson V; Pialat JB; Gay F; Coulon A; Voloch A; Granier A; Guérin JC; Viallon M; Berthezene Y
Am J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jun; 31(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 18525309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy and confidence of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging alone and in combination for the diagnosis of liver metastases.
Donati OF; Fischer MA; Chuck N; Hunziker R; Weishaupt D; Reiner CS
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):822-8. PubMed ID: 23287713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hepatic metastases: detection with multi-detector row CT, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, and both techniques combined.
Onishi H; Murakami T; Kim T; Hori M; Iannaccone R; Kuwabara M; Abe H; Nakata S; Osuga K; Tomoda K; Passariello R; Nakamura H
Radiology; 2006 Apr; 239(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 16484347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced liver MRI with ferucarbotran: efficacy for characterization of focal liver lesions.
Namkung S; Zech CJ; Helmberger T; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(4):755-65. PubMed ID: 17335040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Measurements of Hepatic Metastasis on MR Imaging:: Assessment of Interobserver and Intersequence Variability.
Karademir I; Ward E; Peng Y; Wise L; Buckle C; Kunnavakkam R; Oto A
Acad Radiol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 26548855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. JOURNAL CLUB: Primary Anorectal Melanoma: MRI Findings and Clinicopathologic Correlations.
Park HJ; Kim HJ; Park SH; Lee JS; Kim AY; Kim SW; Hong SM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):W98-W108. PubMed ID: 29927334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differentiation between recurrent tumor and benign conditions after treatment of gynecologic pelvic carcinoma: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging.
Kinkel K; Ariche M; Tardivon AA; Spatz A; Castaigne D; Lhomme C; Vanel D
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 9205223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Visceral metastases from melanoma: findings on MR imaging.
Premkumar A; Sanders L; Marincola F; Feuerstein I; Concepcion R; Schwartzentruber D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 1729784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MR diagnosis of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors versus hemangiomas: relative merits of dynamic gadolinium chelate-enhanced gradient-recalled echo and unenhanced spin-echo images.
Soyer P; Gueye C; Somveille E; Laissy JP; Scherrer A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1407-13. PubMed ID: 7484575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of dual contrast liver MRI at 3.0 T in differentiating well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas from dysplastic nodules: preliminary results of multivariate analysis.
Yoon MA; Kim SH; Park HS; Lee DH; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2009 Oct; 44(10):641-9. PubMed ID: 19724237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: comparison with contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT.
Motosugi U; Ichikawa T; Morisaka H; Sou H; Muhi A; Kimura K; Sano K; Araki T
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):446-53. PubMed ID: 21693662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 18 F-FDG PET/MR imaging in patients with suspected liver lesions: Value of liver-specific contrast agent Gadobenate dimeglumine.
Kirchner J; Sawicki LM; Deuschl C; Grüneisen J; Beiderwellen K; Lauenstein TC; Herrmann K; Forsting M; Heusch P; Umutlu L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180349. PubMed ID: 28683109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Biomarkers for Assessment of Response With Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: Comparison of the Measurements of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases (NETLM) With Various MR Sequences and at Multiple Phases of Contrast Administration.
Luersen GF; Wei W; Tamm EP; Bhosale PR; Szklaruk J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 27636124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
