These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27230235)

  • 1. Phronesis: Beyond the Research Ethics Committee-A Crucial Decision-Making Skill for Health Researchers During Community Research.
    Greeff M; Rennie S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Apr; 11(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 27230235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dilemmas in international research and the value of practical wisdom.
    Jarvis K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2017 Apr; 17(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 27425853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using practical wisdom to facilitate ethical decision-making: a major empirical study of phronesis in the decision narratives of doctors.
    Conroy M; Malik AY; Hale C; Weir C; Brockie A; Turner C
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):16. PubMed ID: 33602193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Jun; 5(2):21-34. PubMed ID: 20569147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phronesis in Medical Ethics: Courage and Motivation to Keep on the Track of Rightness in Decision-Making.
    Malik A; Conroy M; Turner C
    Health Care Anal; 2020 Jun; 28(2):158-175. PubMed ID: 32356112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knowledge of the Nigerian Code of Health Research Ethics Among Biomedical Researchers in Southern Nigeria.
    Ogunrin OA; Daniel F; Ansa V
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Dec; 11(5):397-407. PubMed ID: 27241870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.
    Borry P; Schotsmans P; Dierickx K
    Med Health Care Philos; 2004; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 15139254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics framework for citizen science and public and patient participation in research.
    Groot B; Abma T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):23. PubMed ID: 35282819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics of caring and the institutional ethics committee.
    Sichel BA
    Hypatia; 1989; 4(2):45-56. PubMed ID: 11650330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pedagogical Support for Responsible Conduct of Research Training.
    Anderson MA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26786037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical decision making in committee. A view from Germany.
    Sass HM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):65-81. PubMed ID: 15282922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Person-oriented research ethics: integrating relational and everyday ethics in research.
    Cascio MA; Racine E
    Account Res; 2018; 25(3):170-197. PubMed ID: 29451025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring perceptions and experiences of Bolivian health researchers with research ethics.
    Sullivan S; Aalborg A; Basagoitia A; Cortes J; Lanza O; Schwind JS
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 25784714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: a preliminary study.
    Deming N; Fryer-Edwards K; Dudzinski D; Starks H; Culver J; Hopley E; Robins L; Burke W
    Acad Med; 2007 Jan; 82(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 17198285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
    Larkin PJ; de Casterlé BD; Schotsmans P
    Nurs Ethics; 2008 Mar; 15(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18272613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.
    Tansey CM; Anderson J; Boulanger RF; Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Schwartz L; Hunt M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28659166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics and Science in the Participatory Era: A Vignette-Based Delphi Study.
    Bromley E; Mikesell L; Khodyakov D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):295-309. PubMed ID: 28691559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Ethics of Doing Ethics.
    Hansson SO
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Feb; 23(1):105-120. PubMed ID: 26984874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members.
    Hokke S; Hackworth NJ; Bennetts SK; Nicholson JM; Keyzer P; Lucke J; Zion L; Crawford SB
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020; 15(1-2):12-27. PubMed ID: 31195884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early-career researchers' views on ethical dimensions of patient engagement in research.
    Bélisle-Pipon JC; Rouleau G; Birko S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):21. PubMed ID: 29514618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.