These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27230305)

  • 1. Dominance of texture over shape in facial identity processing is modulated by individual abilities.
    Itz ML; Golle J; Luttmann S; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):369-396. PubMed ID: 27230305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The roles of shape and texture in the recognition of familiar faces.
    Rogers D; Baseler H; Young AW; Jenkins R; Andrews TJ
    Vision Res; 2022 May; 194():108013. PubMed ID: 35124521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.
    Itz ML; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 17(1):185-197. PubMed ID: 27718208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High and low performers differ in the use of shape information for face recognition.
    Kaufmann JM; Schulz C; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1310-9. PubMed ID: 23562837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurocognitive effects of a training program for poor face recognizers using shape and texture caricatures: A pilot investigation.
    Limbach K; Itz ML; Schweinberger SR; Jentsch AD; Romanova L; Kaufmann JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Jan; 165():108133. PubMed ID: 34971671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces.
    Weibert K; Andrews TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():588-96. PubMed ID: 26187507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similar use of shape and texture cues for own- and other-race faces during face learning and recognition.
    Zhou X; Itz ML; Vogt S; Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Mondloch CJ
    Vision Res; 2021 Nov; 188():32-41. PubMed ID: 34280815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personal familiarity enhances sensitivity to horizontal structure during processing of face identity.
    Pachai MV; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ; Schyns PG; Ramon M
    J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):5. PubMed ID: 28593249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early temporal negativity is sensitive to perceived (rather than physical) facial identity.
    Faerber SJ; Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():132-42. PubMed ID: 26013406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Familiar Face Priming: The Role of Second-Order Configuration and Individual Face Recognition Abilities.
    Itz ML; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM
    Perception; 2018 Feb; 47(2):185-196. PubMed ID: 29165025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The activation of visual face memory and explicit face recognition are delayed in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Parketny J; Towler J; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():538-47. PubMed ID: 26169316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.
    Ritchie KL; Smith FG; Jenkins R; Bindemann M; White D; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():161-9. PubMed ID: 25988915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hometown size affects the processing of naturalistic face variability.
    Balas B; Saville A
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():228-236. PubMed ID: 28025050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Caricaturing in Shape or Color on Familiarity Decisions for Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces.
    Itz ML; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149796. PubMed ID: 26900690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in face processing captured by ERPs.
    Turano MT; Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Mar; 101():1-8. PubMed ID: 26747730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Idiosyncratic, Retinotopic Bias in Face Identification Modulated by Familiarity.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Taylor M; Cavanagh P; Gobbini MI
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(5):. PubMed ID: 30294669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.
    Collins E; Robinson AK; Behrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():120-131. PubMed ID: 29966716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.