These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27231158)

  • 1. Shortcomings of an approximate confidence interval for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Hoaglin DC
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):459-461. PubMed ID: 27231158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approximate confidence intervals for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis.
    Jackson D; Bowden J; Baker R
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 26287958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved Fisher z estimators for univariate random-effects meta-analysis of correlations.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):233-61. PubMed ID: 18257972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transforming the Model T: random effects meta-analysis with stable weights.
    Malloy MJ; Prendergast LA; Staudte RG
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1842-64. PubMed ID: 23097338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.
    Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 8731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimators and confidence intervals for the proportion using binary auxiliary information with applications to pharmaceutical studies.
    Rueda M; Muñoz JF; Arcos A; Álvarez E; Martínez S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):526-54. PubMed ID: 21442524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncertainty of the time of first significance in random effects cumulative meta-analysis.
    Berkey CS; Mosteller F; Lau J; Antman EM
    Control Clin Trials; 1996 Oct; 17(5):357-71. PubMed ID: 8932970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation Comparison of the Quality Effects and Random Effects Methods of Meta-analysis.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ; Khan S; Thalib L; Williams GM
    Epidemiology; 2015 Jul; 26(4):e42-4. PubMed ID: 25872162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
    Noma H
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes.
    Mathes T; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):366-381. PubMed ID: 29573180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multistep estimators of the between-study variance: The relationship with the Paule-Mandel estimator.
    van Aert RCM; Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(17):2616-2629. PubMed ID: 29700839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?
    Jackson D; Bowden J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):118. PubMed ID: 27604952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalised Cochran heterogeneity statistics.
    Jackson D
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 26053842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence interval estimation for number of patient-years needed to treat.
    Zhu H; Wu X
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(6):403-9. PubMed ID: 25313518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate.
    Knapp G; Hartung J
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2693-710. PubMed ID: 12939780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.