These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

684 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27231812)

  • 1. Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review.
    Buser Z; Brodke DS; Youssef JA; Meisel HJ; Myhre SL; Hashimoto R; Park JB; Tim Yoon S; Wang JC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):509-516. PubMed ID: 27231812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biological substitutes/extenders for spinal arthrodesis: which agents are cost-effective?
    Hsu WK; Hashimoto RE; Berven SH; Nassr A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22 Suppl 1):S86-98. PubMed ID: 25299264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of 45S5 Bioactive Glass in A Standard Calcium Phosphate Collagen Bone Graft Substitute on the Posterolateral Fusion of Rabbit Spine.
    Pugely AJ; Petersen EB; DeVries-Watson N; Fredericks DC
    Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():193-198. PubMed ID: 28852357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion.
    Kaiser MG; Groff MW; Watters WC; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Sharan A; Wang JC; Dhall SS; Resnick DK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):106-32. PubMed ID: 24980593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of lumbar spine with beta-tricalcium phosphate versus autograft: a prospective, randomized study with 3-year follow-up.
    Dai LY; Jiang LS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1299-304. PubMed ID: 18496340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Demineralized bone matrix in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review.
    Zadegan SA; Abedi A; Jazayeri SB; Vaccaro AR; Rahimi-Movaghar V
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):958-974. PubMed ID: 27832365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review of anterior interbody fusion techniques for single- and double-level cervical degenerative disc disease.
    Jacobs W; Willems PC; Kruyt M; van Limbeek J; Anderson PG; Pavlov P; Bartels R; Oner C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):E950-60. PubMed ID: 21522044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2.
    Arnold PM; Anderson KK; Selim A; Dryer RF; Kenneth Burkus J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 27129045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Allograft and Autograft in Lumbar Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review.
    Liao Z; Wang CH; Cui WL
    J Invest Surg; 2016 Dec; 29(6):373-382. PubMed ID: 27064603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages.
    Yang C; Zhuo W; Li Q; Huang C; Yan H; Jin D
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 33557893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Titanium cages versus autogenous iliac crest bone grafts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion treatment of patients with cervical degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shao MH; Zhang F; Yin J; Xu HC; Lyu FZ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2017 May; 33(5):803-811. PubMed ID: 28097889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results of lumbar spondylodeses using different bone grafting materials after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
    vonderHoeh NH; Voelker A; Heyde CE
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 28547573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fusion rate and clinical outcome in anterior lumbar interbody fusion with beta-tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute. A prospective clinical study in fifty patients.
    Lechner R; Putzer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
    Int Orthop; 2017 Feb; 41(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 27770186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic, biomechanical, and histological evaluation of rhBMP-2 in a 3-level intertransverse process spine fusion: an ovine study.
    Toth JM; Wang M; Lawson J; Badura JM; DuBose KB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):733-739. PubMed ID: 27367941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective clinical and radiographic 12-month outcome study of patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease utilizing a novel viable allogeneic, cancellous, bone matrix (trinity evolution™) with a comparison to historical controls.
    Vanichkachorn J; Peppers T; Bullard D; Stanley SK; Linovitz RJ; Ryaby JT
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2233-8. PubMed ID: 26849141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective randomized study of posterolateral lumbar fusion using osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1) versus local autograft with ceramic bone substitute: emphasis of surgical exploration and histologic assessment.
    Kanayama M; Hashimoto T; Shigenobu K; Yamane S; Bauer TW; Togawa D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(10):1067-74. PubMed ID: 16648739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Autograft versus Allograft for Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review.
    Tuchman A; Brodke DS; Youssef JA; Meisel HJ; Dettori JR; Park JB; Yoon ST; Wang JC
    Global Spine J; 2017 Feb; 7(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 28451511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Osteoconductive bone graft extenders in posterolateral thoracolumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review.
    Alsaleh KA; Tougas CA; Roffey DM; Wai EK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E993-1000. PubMed ID: 22414999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes for bone morphogenetic protein versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar fusion in degenerative disk disease: systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Noshchenko A; Hoffecker L; Lindley EM; Burger EL; Cain CM; Patel VV
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 May; 27(3):117-35. PubMed ID: 24945290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spinal fusion procedures in the adult and young population: a systematic review on allogenic bone and synthetic grafts when compared to autologous bone.
    Salamanna F; Tschon M; Borsari V; Pagani S; Martini L; Fini M
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2020 May; 31(6):51. PubMed ID: 32451687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.