363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27232247)
1. Considering Value in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes Based on the Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approach for Proctectomy.
Silva-Velazco J; Dietz DW; Stocchi L; Costedio M; Gorgun E; Kalady MF; Kessler H; Lavery IC; Remzi FH
Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):960-968. PubMed ID: 27232247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic restorative proctectomy - hybrid approach or totally laparoscopic?
Ellis-Clark JM; Lumley JW; Stevenson AR; Stitz RW
ANZ J Surg; 2010 Nov; 80(11):807-12. PubMed ID: 20969688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-conscious robotic restorative proctectomy has similar economic and oncologic outcomes to open restorative proctectomy: Results of a long-term follow-up study.
Cengiz TB; Benlice C; Ozgur I; Kaya G; Aytac E; Kalady MF; Steele SR; Liska D; Gorgun E
Int J Med Robot; 2021 Dec; 17(6):e2331. PubMed ID: 34514721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic versus open techniques in rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis of 121 sphincter-saving procedures in a single institution.
Lam HD; Stefano M; Tran-Ba T; Tinton N; Cambier E; Navez B
Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):454-62. PubMed ID: 20607562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage I rectal cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes.
Lee SD; Park SC; Park JW; Kim DY; Choi HS; Oh JH
World J Surg; 2013 Mar; 37(3):646-51. PubMed ID: 23188532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
Pai A; Marecik SJ; Park JJ; Melich G; Sulo S; Prasad LM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 26200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.
Park EJ; Cho MS; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 24662411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?
Bayraktar O; Aytaç E; Özben V; Atasoy D; Bilgin İA; Erenler Bayraktar İ; Baca B; Hamzaoğlu İ; Karahasanoğlu T
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2018 Feb; 28(1):e8-e11. PubMed ID: 29252933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic review of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Holmer C; Kreis ME
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):569-581. PubMed ID: 29218670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
