194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27232253)
1. Potential Pitfalls of Reporting and Bias in Observational Studies With Propensity Score Analysis Assessing a Surgical Procedure: A Methodological Systematic Review.
Lonjon G; Porcher R; Ergina P; Fouet M; Boutron I
Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):901-909. PubMed ID: 27232253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Propensity Score Methodology in Contemporary High-Impact Surgical Literature.
Grose E; Wilson S; Barkun J; Bertens K; Martel G; Balaa F; Abou Khalil J
J Am Coll Surg; 2020 Jan; 230(1):101-112.e2. PubMed ID: 31672675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting and Guidelines in Propensity Score Analysis: A Systematic Review of Cancer and Cancer Surgical Studies.
Yao XI; Wang X; Speicher PJ; Hwang ES; Cheng P; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Schrag D; Pang HH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Aug; 109(8):. PubMed ID: 28376195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures.
Lonjon G; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Ahmad N; Aim F; Nizard R; Ravaud P
Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 24096758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do the observational studies using propensity score analysis agree with randomized controlled trials in the area of sepsis?
Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
J Crit Care; 2014 Oct; 29(5):886.e9-15. PubMed ID: 24996762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use and quality of reporting of propensity score methods in multiple sclerosis literature: A review.
Karim ME; Pellegrini F; Platt RW; Simoneau G; Rouette J; de Moor C
Mult Scler; 2022 Aug; 28(9):1317-1323. PubMed ID: 33179573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observational studies using propensity score analysis underestimated the effect sizes in critical care medicine.
Zhang Z; Ni H; Xu X
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):932-9. PubMed ID: 24774469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review.
Jacquier I; Boutron I; Moher D; Roy C; Ravaud P
Ann Surg; 2006 Nov; 244(5):677-83. PubMed ID: 17060758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performing both propensity score and instrumental variable analyses in observational studies often leads to discrepant results: a systematic review.
Laborde-Castérot H; Agrinier N; Thilly N
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 68(10):1232-40. PubMed ID: 26026496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the acute care surgery literature: avoiding the pitfalls and proposing a set of reporting guidelines.
Zakrison TL; Austin PC; McCredie VA
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 28342097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of fibrin sealant during non-emergency surgery: a systematic review of evidence of benefits and harms.
Edwards SJ; Crawford F; van Velthoven MH; Berardi A; Osei-Assibey G; Bacelar M; Salih F; Wakefield V
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(94):1-224. PubMed ID: 28051764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Handling missing data in propensity score estimation in comparative effectiveness evaluations: a systematic review.
Malla L; Perera-Salazar R; McFadden E; Ogero M; Stepniewska K; English M
J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Mar; 7(3):271-279. PubMed ID: 28980833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reporting of covariate selection and balance assessment in propensity score analysis is suboptimal: a systematic review.
Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Belitser SV; Pestman WR; Hoes AW; Roes KC; Boer Ad; Klungel OH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 25433444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of propensity score used in cardiovascular research: a cross-sectional survey and guidance document.
Samuel M; Batomen B; Rouette J; Kim J; Platt RW; Brophy JM; Kaufman JS
BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e036961. PubMed ID: 32847911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new weighted balance measure helped to select the variables to be included in a propensity score model.
Caruana E; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M; Pirracchio R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1415-22.e2. PubMed ID: 26050059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical appraisal of the application of propensity score methods in the urology literature.
Nayan M; Hamilton RJ; Juurlink DN; Finelli A; Kulkarni GS; Austin PC
BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):873-880. PubMed ID: 28608364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use and Interpretation of Propensity Scores in Aging Research: A Guide for Clinical Researchers.
Kim DH; Pieper CF; Ahmed A; Colón-Emeric CS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2016 Oct; 64(10):2065-2073. PubMed ID: 27550392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
