These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27232253)
21. Confounding adjustment in observational studies on cardiothoracic interventions: a systematic review of methodological practice. Velders BJJ; Boltje JWT; Vriesendorp MD; Klautz RJM; Le Cessie S; Groenwold RHH Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Oct; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 37505476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Propensity score matching in otolaryngologic literature: A systematic review and critical appraisal. Prasad A; Shin M; Carey RM; Chorath K; Parhar H; Appel S; Moreira A; Rajasekaran K PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244423. PubMed ID: 33382777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Applying propensity score methods in medical research: pitfalls and prospects. Luo Z; Gardiner JC; Bradley CJ Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Oct; 67(5):528-54. PubMed ID: 20442340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Propensity scores in intensive care and anaesthesiology literature: a systematic review. Gayat E; Pirracchio R; Resche-Rigon M; Mebazaa A; Mary JY; Porcher R Intensive Care Med; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1993-2003. PubMed ID: 20689924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Applications of propensity score methods in observational comparative effectiveness and safety research: where have we come and where should we go? Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Crown WH; Doshi JA J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 24266593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Within-center matching performed better when using propensity score matching to analyze multicenter survival data: empirical and Monte Carlo studies. Gayat E; Thabut G; Christie JD; Mebazaa A; Mary JY; Porcher R J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1029-37. PubMed ID: 23800533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched propensity score analyses. Kuss O J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 23972521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in Observational Studies of Treatment Effect. Johnson SR; Tomlinson GA; Hawker GA; Granton JT; Feldman BM Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2018 May; 44(2):203-213. PubMed ID: 29622292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effectiveness of triple therapy with direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C genotype 1 infection: application of propensity score matching in a national HCV treatment registry. Gray E; Pasta DJ; Norris S; O'Leary A; BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Apr; 17(1):288. PubMed ID: 28424064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How Do Propensity Score Methods Measure Up in the Presence of Measurement Error? A Monte Carlo Study. RodrÃguez De Gil P; Bellara AP; Lanehart RE; Lee RS; Kim ES; Kromrey JD Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):520-32. PubMed ID: 26610250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data. Giordano SH Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2015; ():e330-5. PubMed ID: 25993193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can We Trust Observational Studies Using Propensity Scores in the Critical Care Literature? A Systematic Comparison With Randomized Clinical Trials. Kitsios GD; Dahabreh IJ; Callahan S; Paulus JK; Campagna AC; Dargin JM Crit Care Med; 2015 Sep; 43(9):1870-9. PubMed ID: 26086943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions. Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A review of the performance of different methods for propensity score matched subgroup analyses and a summary of their application in peer-reviewed research studies. Wang SV; He M; Jin Y; Wyss R; Shin H; Ma Y; Keeton S; Fireman B; Karami S; Major JM; Schneeweiss S; Gagne JJ Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1507-1512. PubMed ID: 28984001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials. Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Methodological aspects in the assessment of treatment effects in observational health outcomes studies. Haro JM; Kontodimas S; Negrin MA; Ratcliffe M; Suarez D; Windmeijer F Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2006; 5(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 16774289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing validity of observational intervention studies - the Benchmarking Controlled Trials. Malmivaara A Ann Med; 2016 Sep; 48(6):440-443. PubMed ID: 27238631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]