These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27232895)

  • 1. Effect of Masking on Subjective Responses to Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Keir N; Luensmann D; Woods CA; Bergenske P; Fahmy M; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):828-35. PubMed ID: 27232895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring Daily Disposable Contact Lenses against Nonwearer Benchmarks.
    Lazon de la Jara P; Diec J; Naduvilath T; Papas EB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1088-1095. PubMed ID: 30451803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear.
    Dumbleton KA; Woods CA; Jones LW; Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 18787429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comfort response of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.
    Varikooty J; Keir N; Richter D; Jones LW; Woods C; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Sep; 90(9):945-53. PubMed ID: 23892493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses.
    Walker J; Young G; Hunt C; Henderson T
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17395523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers.
    Nason RJ; Boshnick EL; Cannon WM; Dubow BW; Freeman MI; Kame RT; Lanier JC; Lopanik RW; Quinn TG; Rigel LE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Nov; 65(11):774-80. PubMed ID: 7822675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of replacement schedule and care regimen on patient comfort and satisfaction with daily wear frequent-replacement contact lenses.
    Malet F; Schnider CM
    CLAO J; 2002 Jul; 28(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 12144230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consequences of wear interruption for discomfort with contact lenses.
    Papas EB; Tilia D; Tomlinson D; Williams J; Chan E; Chan J; Golebiowski B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 91(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 24141634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel.
    Cheung SW; Cho P; Chan B; Choy C; Ng V
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 17311574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Evaluation of Large Diameter Rigid-Gas Permeable Versus Soft Toric Contact Lenses for the Correction of Refractive Astigmatism. A MultiCenter Study.
    Michaud L; Bennett ES; Woo SL; Reeder R; Morgan BW; Dinardo A; Harthan JS
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):164-169. PubMed ID: 27898516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing two different daily disposable lenses for improving discomfort related to contact lens wear.
    Michaud L; Forcier P
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Jun; 39(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 26639027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective comparison of 2 daily disposable contact lenses: Focus Dailies with AquaRelease and Proclear 1-Day.
    Scott WL; Rein MJ; Pack LD
    Optometry; 2010 Jan; 81(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 20004877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical performance of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses.
    Varikooty J; Schulze MM; Dumbleton K; Keir N; Woods CA; Fonn D; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 25628269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of contact lens surface properties on comfort, tear stability and ocular physiology.
    Vidal-Rohr M; Wolffsohn JS; Davies LN; Cerviño A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Feb; 41(1):117-121. PubMed ID: 28927731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Investigation of Flat Pack Toric Contact Lenses and Wearer Attitudes to Environmental Impact.
    Ghorbani-Mojarrad N; Rountree L; Terry L; Bruce H; Hallam E; Jolly L; Retallic N; Evans K
    Eye Contact Lens; 2023 Nov; 49(11):475-482. PubMed ID: 37707468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crossover Evaluation of Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Wolffsohn JS; Mroczkowska S; Hunt OA; Bilkhu P; Drew T; Sheppard A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1063-8. PubMed ID: 26390350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of Subjective Symptoms and Eye Complications When Changing From 2-Week Frequent Replacement to Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in a Subscriber Membership System.
    Ichijima H; Karino S; Sakata H; Cavanagh HD
    Eye Contact Lens; 2016 May; 42(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 25996420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of daily disposable lenses in problematic reusable contact lens wearers.
    Hickson-Curran S; Spyridon M; Hunt C; Young G
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Aug; 37(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24709223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient experience and physiological response to two commercially available daily disposable myopia control contact lenses.
    Ghorbani-Mojarrad N; Cargill C; Collard S; Terry L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Apr; 45(2):101426. PubMed ID: 33618977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of fitting toric soft contact lenses to current non-users.
    Sulley A; Young G; Lorenz KO; Hunt C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 23406489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.