236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2723319)
21. Self-identification and the morality of abortion.
Lusby K
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The pregnant woman and the good Samaritan: can a woman have a duty to undergo a caesarean section?
Scott R
Oxf J Leg Stud; 2000; 20(3):407-36. PubMed ID: 12452142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy.
Arch RR
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):637-73. PubMed ID: 8666737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. From the dead to the unborn: is there an ethical duty to save life?
Sperling D
Med Law; 2004; 23(3):567-85. PubMed ID: 15532949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Current controversies in obstetrics: wrongful life and forced fetal surgical procedures.
Engelhardt HT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 151(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 3970098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
Rhoden NK
Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery?
Knopoff KA
Calif Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 79(2):499-540. PubMed ID: 11659841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The ethics of in utero fetal surgery. A possible threat to the autonomy of pregnant women?
Twomey JG
Nurs Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 24(4):1025-32. PubMed ID: 2685771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 162(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 2309810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion and self-defense.
Davis N
Philos Public Aff; 1984; 13(3):175-207. PubMed ID: 11655659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The ethics of abortion.
Gardner RF
Practitioner; 1979 Aug; 223(1334):244-8. PubMed ID: 504058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A pregnant woman's decision to decline treatment: how should the law respond?
Seymour J
J Law Med; 1994 Aug; 2(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 11660250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Feminism and abortion.
Bayles M
Atl Mon; 1990 Apr; 265(4):79, 84-88. PubMed ID: 11655972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.
Tauer CA
Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(3):18, 20-27. PubMed ID: 11652082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Bioethics for clinicians: 12. Ethical dilemmas that arise in the care of pregnant women: rethinking "maternal-fetal conflicts".
Flagler E; Baylis F; Rodgers S
CMAJ; 1997 Jun; 156(12):1729-32. PubMed ID: 9220925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The moral status of the near-term fetus.
Strong C; Anderson G
J Med Ethics; 1989 Mar; 15(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 2926783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
Bennett B
Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion.
Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M
Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
Gallagher J
Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]