These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2723322)

  • 1. Clinical objective assessment of the accommodative response.
    Eskridge JB
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Apr; 60(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 2723322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of accommodative facility using MEM retinoscopy.
    Gallaway M; Scheiman M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Jan; 61(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 2319091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a satisfied bilateral scleral expansion band patient.
    Ostrin LA; Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 15210221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 "accommodative" intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA; Motwani NK; Shah S; Hunt OA; Mantry S; Sira M; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 90(6):693-6. PubMed ID: 16531421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.
    Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Toda I; Fujishima H; Arai H; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Hida Y; Yagi Y; Tsubota K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15975453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accommodation and the relationship to subjective symptoms with near work for young school children.
    Sterner B; Gellerstedt M; Sjöström A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Mar; 26(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 16460315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens.
    Heatley CJ; Spalton DJ; Hancox J; Kumar A; Marshall J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 15992754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept.
    Alió JL; Ben-nun J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Plaza AB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 19781458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accommodative response in pre-presbyopes with visual impairment and its clinical implications.
    Leat SJ; Mohr A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 48(8):3888-96. PubMed ID: 17652765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens].
    Wang J; Fu J; Wang NL; Kang HJ; Yang WL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 41(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 16191347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accommodative lag using dynamic retinoscopy: age norms for school-age children.
    McClelland JF; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):929-33. PubMed ID: 15592117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual discomfort and objective measures of static accommodation.
    Chase C; Tosha C; Borsting E; Ridder WH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 86(7):883-9. PubMed ID: 19521268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical judgement of near pupil responses provides a useful indicator of focusing ability in children with cerebral palsy.
    Saunders KJ; McClelland JF; Richardson PM; Stevenson M
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Jan; 50(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 18173628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: part II. Development of an amplitude-scaled test.
    Yothers T; Wick B; Morse SE
    Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 12365715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error.
    Allen PM; O'Leary DJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(4):491-505. PubMed ID: 16009391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
    Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthoptic effects on accommodation and related visual functions in an adult alternating esotrope.
    Schnider CM; Ciuffreda KJ; Selenow A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(4):425-33. PubMed ID: 4088676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Charman WN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 48(9):4375-82. PubMed ID: 17724230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unusual presentations of accommodative esotropia.
    Pollard ZF; Greenberg MF
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2000; 98():119-24; discussion 124-5. PubMed ID: 11190015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.