227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27233599)
1. Functional and clinical outcomes following anterior hip replacement: a 5-year comparative study versus posterior approach.
Balasubramaniam U; Dowsey M; Ma F; Dunin A; Choong P
ANZ J Surg; 2016 Jul; 86(7-8):589-93. PubMed ID: 27233599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mini-anterior approach to the hip for total joint replacement: optimising results: improving hip joint replacement outcomes.
Mirza AJ; Lombardi AV; Morris MJ; Berend KR
Bone Joint J; 2014 Nov; 96-B(11 Supple A):32-5. PubMed ID: 25381405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA?
Graves SC; Dropkin BM; Keeney BJ; Lurie JD; Tomek IM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 26620966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of surgical experience in the learning curve of a new approach in hip replacement: anterior mini-invasive vs. standard lateral.
Pogliacomi F; Paraskevopoulos A; Costantino C; Marenghi P; Ceccarelli F
Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 23023648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of anterolateral approach versus posterior approach for total hip replacement in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.
Wang G; Gu GS; Li D; Sun DH; Zhang W; Wang TJ
Chin J Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 13(4):234-9. PubMed ID: 20670581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The anterior approach for hip replacement.
Matta JM; Ferguson TA
Orthopedics; 2005 Sep; 28(9):927-8. PubMed ID: 16190055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Preliminary clinical application of SL-PLUS MIA femoral stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty].
Wei B; Wang L; Jin C; Xu Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 23672125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach total hip versus conventional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Xie J; Zhang H; Wang L; Yao X; Pan Z; Jiang Q
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 12(1):138. PubMed ID: 28946892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the direct anterior approach allow earlier recovery of walking following total hip arthroplasty? A randomized prospective trial using accelerometry.
Bon G; Kacem EB; Lepretre PM; Weissland T; Mertl P; Dehl M; Gabrion A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 May; 105(3):445-452. PubMed ID: 30853454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Prospective and comparative study of minimally invasive posterior approach versus standard posterior approach in total hip replacement].
Laffosse JM; Chiron P; Tricoire JL; Giordano G; Molinier F; Puget J
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 17534205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty--our clinical experience.
Rapała K; Obrebski M; Rapała A; Milecki M; Tarnowski A
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2007; 9(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17514172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year.
Martin R; Clayson PE; Troussel S; Fraser BP; Docquier PL
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1362-72. PubMed ID: 21435823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinical outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty by conventional anterolateral transgluteal or 2-incision approach.
Chen DW; Hu CC; Chang YH; Yang WE; Lee MS
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 18676112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach.
Goebel S; Steinert AF; Schillinger J; Eulert J; Broscheit J; Rudert M; Nöth U
Int Orthop; 2012 Mar; 36(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 21611823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Minimally invasive anterolateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty: seven-year results].
Musil D; Stehlík J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 23562258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach.
Spaans AJ; van den Hout JA; Bolder SB
Acta Orthop; 2012 Aug; 83(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 22880711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced recovery programmes after total hip arthroplasty can result in reduced length of hospital stay without compromising functional outcome.
Maempel JF; Clement ND; Ballantyne JA; Dunstan E
Bone Joint J; 2016 Apr; 98-B(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 27037429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early morbidity and mortality after one-stage bilateral THA: Anterior versus posterior approach.
Micicoi G; Bernard de Dompsure R; Tran L; Carles M; Boileau P; Bronsard N; Trojani C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1265-1270. PubMed ID: 31591065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini-incision total hip replacement--surgical technique and early results.
Chung WK; Liu D; Foo LS
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2004 Jun; 12(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15237117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Minimally invasive vs. transgluteal total hip replacement. A 3-month follow-up of a prospective randomized clinical study].
Wohlrab D; Droege JW; Mendel T; Brehme K; Riedl K; Leuchte S; Hein W
Orthopade; 2008 Nov; 37(11):1121-6. PubMed ID: 18810386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
