209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27233677)
61. The relationship between transepidermal water loss and skin permeability.
Machado M; Salgado TM; Hadgraft J; Lane ME
Int J Pharm; 2010 Jan; 384(1-2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19799976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Reproducibility of repeated measurements on post-burn scars with Dermascan C.
Van den Kerckhove E; Staes F; Flour M; Stappaerts K; Boeckx W
Skin Res Technol; 2003 Feb; 9(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 12535289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Autologous Skin Cell Transplantation and Medical Needling for Repigmentation of Depigmented Burn Scars on UV-protected and UV-exposed Skin].
Busch KH; Bender R; Walezko N; Aziz H; Altintas MA; Aust MC
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2016 Dec; 48(6):346-353. PubMed ID: 27835917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Ceramide 1 and ceramide 3 act synergistically on skin hydration and the transepidermal water loss of sodium lauryl sulfate-irritated skin.
Huang HC; Chang TM
Int J Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):812-9. PubMed ID: 18717861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Objective color measurements: clinimetric performance of three devices on normal skin and scar tissue.
van der Wal M; Bloemen M; Verhaegen P; Tuinebreijer W; de Vet H; van Zuijlen P; Middelkoop E
J Burn Care Res; 2013; 34(3):e187-94. PubMed ID: 23237819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Variability in transepidermal water loss of the skin: evaluation of a method to assess susceptibility to contact dermatitis in epidemiological studies.
Smit HA; Pinnagoda J; Tupker RA; Burema J; Coenraads PJ; Nater JP
Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1990; 62(7):509-12. PubMed ID: 2289823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Reproducibility of repeated measurements with the Kikuhime pressure sensor under pressure garments in burn scar treatment.
Van den Kerckhove E; Fieuws S; Massagé P; Hierner R; Boeckx W; Deleuze JP; Laperre J; Anthonissen M
Burns; 2007 Aug; 33(5):572-8. PubMed ID: 17182191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for burn scar regeneration: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.
Lee SY; Joo SY; Cho YS; Hur GY; Seo CH
Burns; 2021 Jun; 47(4):821-827. PubMed ID: 32917473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment.
Draaijers LJ; Botman YA; Tempelman FR; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 15019116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Assessing blood flow, microvasculature, erythema and redness in hypertrophic scars: A cross sectional study showing different features that require precise definitions.
Jaspers MEH; Stekelenburg CM; Simons JM; Brouwer KM; Vlig M; van den Kerckhove E; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PPM
Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 28153584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Sex differences in the skin microbiome of burn scars.
Jung Y; Cui HS; Joo SY; Lee EK; Seo CH; Cho YS
Wound Repair Regen; 2023; 31(4):547-558. PubMed ID: 37129034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Objective Burn Scar Assessment in Clinical Practice Using the Cutometer©: Introduction and Validation of a Standardized Measurement Protocol.
Klimitz FJ; Neubauer H; Stolle A; Ripper S; Daeschler SC; Aman M; Boecker A; Thomas B; Kneser U; Harhaus L
J Burn Care Res; 2023 Jan; 44(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 36300728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Patient experiences of burn scars in adults and children and development of a health-related quality of life conceptual model: A qualitative study.
Simons M; Price N; Kimble R; Tyack Z
Burns; 2016 May; 42(3):620-32. PubMed ID: 26803365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The use of AlloDerm on major burn patients: AlloDerm prevents post-burn joint contracture.
Yim H; Cho YS; Seo CH; Lee BC; Ko JH; Kim D; Hur J; Chun W; Kim JH
Burns; 2010 May; 36(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 20080353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Medical Needling: Effect on Skin Erythema of Hypertrophic Burn Scars.
Busch KH; Aliu A; Walezko N; Aust M
Cureus; 2018 Sep; 10(9):e3260. PubMed ID: 30430049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The evaluation of a clinical scar scale for porcine burn scars.
Wang XQ; Kravchuk O; Liu PY; Kempf M; Boogaard CV; Lau P; Cuttle L; Mill J; Kimble RM
Burns; 2009 Jun; 35(4):538-46. PubMed ID: 19201543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. A Novel, Reliable Protocol to Objectively Assess Scar Stiffness Using Shear Wave Elastography.
DeJong H; Abbott S; Zelesco M; Spilsbury K; Martin L; Sanderson R; Ziman M; Kennedy BF; Wood FM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1614-1629. PubMed ID: 32386847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. A portable device using a closed chamber system for measuring transepidermal water loss: comparison with the conventional method.
Tagami H; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi K
Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 12005122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Devices measuring transepidermal water loss: A systematic review of measurement properties.
Klotz T; Ibrahim A; Maddern G; Caplash Y; Wagstaff M
Skin Res Technol; 2022 Jul; 28(4):497-539. PubMed ID: 35411958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
