314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27233815)
1. Learning curves for laparoscopic hysterectomy after implementation of minimally invasive surgery.
Mavrova R; Radosa JC; Wagenpfeil G; Hamza A; Solomayer EF; Juhasz-Böss I
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 134(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 27233815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations.
Wallwiener M; Taran FA; Rothmund R; Kasperkowiak A; Auwärter G; Ganz A; Kraemer B; Abele H; Schönfisch B; Isaacson KB; Brucker SY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1329-39. PubMed ID: 23775263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subtotal versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy: could women sexual function recovery overcome the surgical outcomes in pre-operatory decision making?
Saccardi C; Gizzo S; Noventa M; Quaranta M; Borgato S; Conte L; Pluchino N; Litta P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25501834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of different laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.
Hobson DT; Imudia AN; Al-Safi ZA; Shade G; Kruger M; Diamond MP; Awonuga AO
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1353-61. PubMed ID: 22124531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-reported quality-of-life and sexual-function outcomes after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): a prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up study in 915 patients.
Brucker SY; Taran FA; Bogdanyova S; Ebersoll S; Wallwiener CW; Schönfisch B; Krämer B; Abele H; Neis F; Sohn C; Gawlik S; Wallwiener D; Wallwiener M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1141-9. PubMed ID: 24973868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
El-Mowafi D; Madkour W; Lall C; Wenger JM
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 May; 11(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15200770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.
Uccella S; Cromi A; Bogani G; Casarin J; Formenti G; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):505-16. PubMed ID: 23870240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Analysis of the surgical learning curve in benign conditions.
Terzi H; Biler A; Demirtas O; Guler OT; Peker N; Kale A
Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():51-57. PubMed ID: 27633451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Surgical Competence: Development and Validation of Rating Scales Used for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy.
Goderstad JM; Sandvik L; Fosse E; Lieng M
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):600-8. PubMed ID: 26966082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G
J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy in Patients with Very Large Uteri: a Retrospective Single-Center Experience at a Major University Hospital.
Schöller D; Taran FA; Wallwiener M; Schönfisch B; Krämer B; Abele H; Neis F; Wallwiener CW; Brucker S
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2017 Mar; 77(3):251-256. PubMed ID: 28392578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation: our experience.
Graziano A; Lo Monte G; Hanni H; Brugger JG; Engl B; Marci R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 25285774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri.
Alperin M; Kivnick S; Poon KY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 23084671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the effect of laparoscopic supracervical and total hysterectomy for uterine fibroids on ovarian reserve by assessing serum anti-mullerian hormone levels: a prospective cohort study.
Yuan H; Wang C; Wang D; Wang Y
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(4):637-41. PubMed ID: 25653041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clermont-Ferrand versus Vectec uterine manipulator for total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Misirlioglu S; Boza A; Urman B; Taskiran C
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2019 Feb; 28(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 29764264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared to total hysterectomy.
Cipullo L; De Paoli S; Fasolino L; Fasolino A
JSLS; 2009; 13(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 19793479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes.
Igwe E; Hernandez E; Rose S; Uppal S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):484.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24949539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complication Rate of Laparoscopic Hysterectomies in Denmark, 2011-2016.
Istre O; Snejbjerg D
JSLS; 2018; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 29551880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
