BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27234649)

  • 1. Assessment of Quality and Content of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy.
    Ellsworth B; Patel H; Kamath AF
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Oct; 32(10):2082-2089. PubMed ID: 27234649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the quality and content of information on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the internet.
    Bruce-Brand RA; Baker JF; Byrne DP; Hogan NA; McCarthy T
    Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1095-100. PubMed ID: 23582738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
    Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perthes Disease: The Quality and Reliability of Information on the Internet.
    Nassiri M; Bruce-Brand RA; O'Neill F; Chenouri S; Curtin P
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2015; 35(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 25254387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
    Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
    Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
    Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
    Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients : The Internet as an information source.
    Janssen S; Käsmann L; Fahlbusch FB; Rades D; Vordermark D
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Feb; 194(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 28856383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy.
    Mehta MP; Swindell HW; Westermann RW; Rosneck JT; Lynch TS
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Jul; 34(7):2142-2149. PubMed ID: 29631940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
    Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surfing for hip replacements: has the "internet tidal wave" led to better quality information.
    Nassiri M; Bruce-Brand RA; O'Neill F; Chenouri S; Curtin PT
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1339-1344.e1. PubMed ID: 24559520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the Internet a Suitable Patient Resource for Information on Common Radiological Investigations?: Radiology-Related Information on the Internet.
    Bowden DJ; Yap LC; Sheppard DG
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):826-830. PubMed ID: 28216191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Content and Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Patients and Families on Adult Kidney Cancer.
    Alsaiari A; Joury A; Aljuaid M; Wazzan M; Pines JM
    J Cancer Educ; 2017 Dec; 32(4):878-884. PubMed ID: 27130549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.
    Joury AU; Alshathri M; Alkhunaizi M; Jaleesah N; Pines JM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 27341392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.
    Lloyd MS; Lafferty K; Horton J; Noons P; Dover S; Evans M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):874-5. PubMed ID: 27192636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of information regarding abnormal uterine bleeding available online.
    Werneck RA; Meinberg MF; Passos MZ; Brandão WC; de Moraes EN; da Silva-Filho AL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Mar; 282():83-88. PubMed ID: 36689893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.