463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27235308)
41. Potential and limits to unravel the genetic architecture and predict the variation of Fusarium head blight resistance in European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
Jiang Y; Zhao Y; Rodemann B; Plieske J; Kollers S; Korzun V; Ebmeyer E; Argillier O; Hinze M; Ling J; Röder MS; Ganal MW; Mette MF; Reif JC
Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Mar; 114(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 25388142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Factors affecting the accuracy of genomic prediction in joint pig populations.
Zhao W; Zhang Z; Wang Z; Ma P; Pan Y; Wang Q; Zhang Z
Animal; 2023 Oct; 17(10):100980. PubMed ID: 37797495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines using non-linear regression models.
Huang H; Windig JJ; Vereijken A; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Nov; 46(1):75. PubMed ID: 25374005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Genomic Prediction and Association Mapping of Curd-Related Traits in Gene Bank Accessions of Cauliflower.
Thorwarth P; Yousef EAA; Schmid KJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Feb; 8(2):707-718. PubMed ID: 29255118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
de Los Campos G; Vazquez AI; Fernando R; Klimentidis YC; Sorensen D
PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(7):e1003608. PubMed ID: 23874214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Improving resistance to the European corn borer: a comprehensive study in elite maize using QTL mapping and genome-wide prediction.
Foiada F; Westermeier P; Kessel B; Ouzunova M; Wimmer V; Mayerhofer W; Presterl T; Dilger M; Kreps R; Eder J; Schön CC
Theor Appl Genet; 2015 May; 128(5):875-91. PubMed ID: 25758357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Genetics of complex traits: prediction of phenotype, identification of causal polymorphisms and genetic architecture.
Goddard ME; Kemper KE; MacLeod IM; Chamberlain AJ; Hayes BJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 283(1835):. PubMed ID: 27440663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Factors underlying natural variation in body pigmentation of Drosophila melanogaster.
Sunaga S; Akiyama N; Miyagi R; Takahashi A
Genes Genet Syst; 2016 Oct; 91(2):127-137. PubMed ID: 27021917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of the Potential for Genomic Selection To Improve Husk Traits in Maize.
Cui Z; Dong H; Zhang A; Ruan Y; He Y; Zhang Z
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3741-3749. PubMed ID: 32816916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.
Jiang Y; Reif JC
Genetics; 2015 Oct; 201(2):759-68. PubMed ID: 26219298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.
van den Berg S; Calus MP; Meuwissen TH; Wientjes YC
BMC Genet; 2015 Dec; 16():146. PubMed ID: 26698836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in chickens using markers.
Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhy A; Esmailizadeh A; Fozi MA; Kranis A; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):16. PubMed ID: 28148241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Genomic prediction of genetic merit using LD-based haplotypes in the Nordic Holstein population.
Cuyabano BC; Su G; Lund MS
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1171. PubMed ID: 25539631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Genomic prediction in biparental tropical maize populations in water-stressed and well-watered environments using low-density and GBS SNPs.
Zhang X; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Semagn K; Beyene Y; Babu R; López-Cruz MA; San Vicente F; Olsen M; Buckler E; Jannink JL; Prasanna BM; Crossa J
Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Mar; 114(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 25407079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Accuracy of genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in white layers.
Heidaritabar M; Calus MP; Megens HJ; Vereijken A; Groenen MA; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):167-79. PubMed ID: 26776363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of Genomic Selection Models to Predict Flowering Time and Spike Grain Number in Two Hexaploid Wheat Doubled Haploid Populations.
Thavamanikumar S; Dolferus R; Thumma BR
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jul; 5(10):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26206349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
