467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27235308)
61. Comparison of Genomic Selection Models to Predict Flowering Time and Spike Grain Number in Two Hexaploid Wheat Doubled Haploid Populations.
Thavamanikumar S; Dolferus R; Thumma BR
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jul; 5(10):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26206349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices.
Zhou L; Lund MS; Wang Y; Su G
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Aug; 131(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 24750283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Genetic Architecture of Micro-Environmental Plasticity in Drosophila melanogaster.
Morgante F; Sørensen P; Sorensen DA; Maltecca C; Mackay TF
Sci Rep; 2015 May; 5():9785. PubMed ID: 25943032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Understanding and predicting complex traits: knowledge from cattle.
Kemper KE; Goddard ME
Hum Mol Genet; 2012 Oct; 21(R1):R45-51. PubMed ID: 22899652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Threshold models for genome-enabled prediction of ordinal categorical traits in plant breeding.
Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Pérez-Rodríguez P; de Los Campos G; Eskridge K; Crossa J
G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Dec; 5(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 25538102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Whole-Genome Resequencing of Experimental Populations Reveals Polygenic Basis of Egg-Size Variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Jha AR; Miles CM; Lippert NR; Brown CD; White KP; Kreitman M
Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Oct; 32(10):2616-32. PubMed ID: 26044351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Genomic prediction based on preselected single-nucleotide polymorphisms from genome-wide association study and imputed whole-genome sequence data annotation for growth traits in Duroc pigs.
Zhang Y; Zhuang Z; Liu Y; Huang J; Luan M; Zhao X; Dong L; Ye J; Yang M; Zheng E; Cai G; Wu Z; Yang J
Evol Appl; 2024 Feb; 17(2):e13651. PubMed ID: 38362509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Using Genetic Distance to Infer the Accuracy of Genomic Prediction.
Scutari M; Mackay I; Balding D
PLoS Genet; 2016 Sep; 12(9):e1006288. PubMed ID: 27589268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The Relative Power of Structural Genomic Variation versus SNPs in Explaining the Quantitative Trait Growth in the Marine Teleost
Ruigrok M; Xue B; Catanach A; Zhang M; Jesson L; Davy M; Wellenreuther M
Genes (Basel); 2022 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 35885912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models.
Cuevas J; Crossa J; Montesinos-López OA; Burgueño J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; de Los Campos G
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jan; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 27793970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines.
Huang W; Massouras A; Inoue Y; Peiffer J; Ràmia M; Tarone AM; Turlapati L; Zichner T; Zhu D; Lyman RF; Magwire MM; Blankenburg K; Carbone MA; Chang K; Ellis LL; Fernandez S; Han Y; Highnam G; Hjelmen CE; Jack JR; Javaid M; Jayaseelan J; Kalra D; Lee S; Lewis L; Munidasa M; Ongeri F; Patel S; Perales L; Perez A; Pu L; Rollmann SM; Ruth R; Saada N; Warner C; Williams A; Wu YQ; Yamamoto A; Zhang Y; Zhu Y; Anholt RR; Korbel JO; Mittelman D; Muzny DM; Gibbs RA; Barbadilla A; Johnston JS; Stone EA; Richards S; Deplancke B; Mackay TF
Genome Res; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1193-208. PubMed ID: 24714809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Genomic Prediction Within and Across Biparental Families: Means and Variances of Prediction Accuracy and Usefulness of Deterministic Equations.
Schopp P; Müller D; Wientjes YCJ; Melchinger AE
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Nov; 7(11):3571-3586. PubMed ID: 28916649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Genomic selection for resistance to mammalian bark stripping and associated chemical compounds in radiata pine.
Nantongo JS; Potts BM; Klápště J; Graham NJ; Dungey HS; Fitzgerald H; O'Reilly-Wapstra JM
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36218439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Genomic evaluation and genome-wide association studies for total number of teats in a combined American and Danish Yorkshire pig populations selected in China.
Fang F; Li J; Guo M; Mei Q; Yu M; Liu H; Legarra A; Xiang T
J Anim Sci; 2022 Jul; 100(7):. PubMed ID: 35553682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Genome-wide prediction of traits with different genetic architecture through efficient variable selection.
Wimmer V; Lehermeier C; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Wang Y; Schön CC
Genetics; 2013 Oct; 195(2):573-87. PubMed ID: 23934883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Pan-genomic open reading frames: A potential supplement of single nucleotide polymorphisms in estimation of heritability and genomic prediction.
Li Z; Simianer H
PLoS Genet; 2020 Aug; 16(8):e1008995. PubMed ID: 32833967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Prior Biological Knowledge Improves Genomic Prediction of Growth-Related Traits in
Farooq M; van Dijk ADJ; Nijveen H; Aarts MGM; Kruijer W; Nguyen TP; Mansoor S; de Ridder D
Front Genet; 2020; 11():609117. PubMed ID: 33552126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Foliar Terpene Traits in
Kainer D; Stone EA; Padovan A; Foley WJ; Külheim C
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(8):2573-2583. PubMed ID: 29891736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
