199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27235521)
21. The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial.
Waterson HB; Clement ND; Eyres KS; Mandalia VI; Toms AD
Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98-B(10):1360-1368. PubMed ID: 27694590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparable clinical outcome and implant longevity after CT- or MRI-based patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of a RCT.
Thijs E; Theeuwen D; Boonen B; van Haaren E; Hendrickx R; Vos R; Borghans R; Kort N; Schotanus MGM
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Jun; 28(6):1821-1826. PubMed ID: 31270591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu XD; Xiang BY; Schotanus MGM; Liu ZH; Chen Y; Huang W
Surgeon; 2017 Dec; 15(6):336-348. PubMed ID: 28756064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Component position alignment with patient-specific jigs in total knee arthroplasty.
Moopanar TR; Amaranath JE; Sorial RM
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Sep; 84(9):628-32. PubMed ID: 24946273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novel alignment measurement technique for total knee arthroplasty using patient specific instrumentation.
Yamamura K; Minoda Y; Mizokawa S; Ohta Y; Sugama R; Nakamura S; Ueyama H; Nakamura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):401-407. PubMed ID: 28097422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Maher PA; Rebolledo BJ; Nawabi DH; McLawhorn AS; Pearle AD
Knee; 2013 Aug; 20(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 23347791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation.
Boonen B; Schotanus MGM; Kerens B; Hulsmans FJ; Tuinebreijer WE; Kort NP
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Sep; 25(9):2809-2817. PubMed ID: 26055253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?
Nunley RM; Ellison BS; Zhu J; Ruh EL; Howell SM; Barrack RL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 470(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 22183477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of planned and achieved implant position in total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific positioning guides.
Leeuwen JA; Grøgaard B; Nordsletten L; Röhrl SM
Acta Orthop; 2015 Apr; 86(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 25386738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation.
Heyse TJ; Tibesku CO
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):268-71. PubMed ID: 23140905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Blakeney WG; Khan RJ; Wall SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(15):1377-84. PubMed ID: 21915542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A multi-planar CT-based comparative analysis of patient-specific cutting guides with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.
Marimuthu K; Chen DB; Harris IA; Wheatley E; Bryant CJ; MacDessi SJ
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1138-42. PubMed ID: 24524776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve radiographic alignment or clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.
Huijbregts HJ; Khan RJ; Sorensen E; Fick DP; Haebich S
Acta Orthop; 2016 Aug; 87(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 27249110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The accuracy of component alignment in custom cutting blocks compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty instrumentation: prospective control trial.
Chotanaphuti T; Wangwittayakul V; Khuangsirikul S; Foojareonyos T
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 23999209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implant positioning in TKA: comparison between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation.
Ferrara F; Cipriani A; Magarelli N; Rapisarda S; De Santis V; Burrofato A; Leone A; Bonomo L
Orthopedics; 2015 Apr; 38(4):e271-80. PubMed ID: 25901619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific guides: Is there a learning curve?
Chinnappa J; Chen DB; Harris IA; MacDessi SJ
Knee; 2015 Dec; 22(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 26120064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Victor J; Dujardin J; Vandenneucker H; Arnout N; Bellemans J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan; 472(1):263-71. PubMed ID: 23616267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The kinematic alignment technique for TKA reliably aligns the femoral component with the cylindrical axis.
Rivière C; Iranpour F; Harris S; Auvinet E; Aframian A; Chabrand P; Cobb J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 103(7):1069-1073. PubMed ID: 28870873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. No difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty two years post-operatively: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Boonen B; Schotanus MG; Kerens B; van der Weegen W; Hoekstra HJ; Kort NP
Bone Joint J; 2016 Jul; 98-B(7):939-44. PubMed ID: 27365472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system.
Roh YW; Kim TW; Lee S; Seong SC; Lee MC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 471(12):3988-95. PubMed ID: 23907610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
