These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27235804)

  • 1. Strategic analysis of a water rights conflict in the south western United States.
    Philpot S; Hipel K; Johnson P
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 180():247-56. PubMed ID: 27235804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selfish third parties act as peacemakers by transforming conflicts and promoting cooperation.
    Halevy N; Halali E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(22):6937-42. PubMed ID: 26038546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A conflict model for the international hazardous waste disposal dispute.
    Hu K; Hipel KW; Fang L
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Dec; 172(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 19665299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influential third party on water right conflict: A Game Theory approach to achieve the desired equilibrium (case study: Ilam dam, Iran).
    Zanjanian H; Abdolabadi H; Niksokhan MH; Sarang A
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 214():283-294. PubMed ID: 29533826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will Peaceful Waters Flow Again? A Game-Theoretic Insight into a Tripartite Environmental Conflict in the Middle East.
    Akbari A; Mirnasl N; Hipel KW
    Environ Manage; 2021 Apr; 67(4):667-681. PubMed ID: 33544229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Two-Stage Decision Framework for Resolving Brownfield Conflicts.
    Han Q; Zhu Y; Ke GY; Lin H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 30909441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Improved Graph Model for Conflict Resolution Based on Option Prioritization and Its Application.
    Yin K; Yu L; Li X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Oct; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 29077049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian Belief Network to support conflict analysis for groundwater protection: the case of the Apulia region.
    Giordano R; D'Agostino D; Apollonio C; Lamaddalena N; Vurro M
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 115():136-46. PubMed ID: 23246906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of the Mississippi v. Tennessee Supreme Court Decision for Interstate Groundwater Management.
    Wasankar N; Clement TP
    Ground Water; 2024; 62(4):502-512. PubMed ID: 38439506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urban Thirst and Rural Water: The Saga of the Southern Nevada Groundwater Development Project.
    Jones NL; Mayo AL
    Ground Water; 2024; 62(2):310-323. PubMed ID: 37793027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of third party expertise on disputants' reactions to mediation.
    Arnold JA
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Oct; 101(2):407-18. PubMed ID: 18175479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Devils lake emergency outlet diversion conflict.
    Ma J; Hipel KW; De M
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):437-47. PubMed ID: 20947242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and application of coupled system dynamics and game theory: A dynamic water conflict resolution method.
    Zomorodian M; Lai SH; Homayounfar M; Ibrahim S; Pender G
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188489. PubMed ID: 29216200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Novel Preference Elicitation Technique Based on a Graph Model and Its Application to a Brownfield Redevelopment Conflict in China.
    Zhao S; Xu H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(21):. PubMed ID: 31652907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of a Brownfield Conflict Considering the Strength of Preferences.
    Yu J; Pei LL
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 29495314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Want collaboration? Accept--and actively manage--conflict.
    Weiss J; Hughes J
    Harv Bus Rev; 2005 Mar; 83(3):92-101, 149. PubMed ID: 15768679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Groundwater Governance in the United States: Common Priorities and Challenges.
    Megdal SB; Gerlak AK; Varady RG; Huang LY
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(5):677-84. PubMed ID: 25406503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preference prediction analysis based on graph model for environmental governance conflict.
    Zhao J; Yang B
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Apr; 19(6):6141-6156. PubMed ID: 35603395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of health care ADR (alternative dispute resolution) in reducing legal fees.
    Joseph DM
    Physician Exec; 1995 Nov; 21(11):26-30. PubMed ID: 10153732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of non-cooperative dynamic game theory for groundwater conflict resolution.
    Nazari S; Ahmadi A; Kamrani Rad S; Ebrahimi B
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 270():110889. PubMed ID: 32721327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.