527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27236213)
1. DNA damage tolerance by recombination: Molecular pathways and DNA structures.
Branzei D; Szakal B
DNA Repair (Amst); 2016 Aug; 44():68-75. PubMed ID: 27236213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A postincision-deficient TFIIH causes replication fork breakage and uncovers alternative Rad51- or Pol32-mediated restart mechanisms.
Moriel-Carretero M; Aguilera A
Mol Cell; 2010 Mar; 37(5):690-701. PubMed ID: 20227372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-resolution genomic assays provide insight into the division of labor between TLS and HDR in mammalian replication of damaged DNA.
Livneh Z; Cohen IS; Paz-Elizur T; Davidovsky D; Carmi D; Swain U; Mirlas-Neisberg N
DNA Repair (Amst); 2016 Aug; 44():59-67. PubMed ID: 27262613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA Damage Tolerance Pathway Choice Through Uls1 Modulation of Srs2 SUMOylation in
Kramarz K; Mucha S; Litwin I; Barg-Wojas A; Wysocki R; Dziadkowiec D
Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):513-525. PubMed ID: 28341648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pol32 is required for Pol zeta-dependent translesion synthesis and prevents double-strand breaks at the replication fork.
Hanna M; Ball LG; Tong AH; Boone C; Xiao W
Mutat Res; 2007 Dec; 625(1-2):164-76. PubMed ID: 17681555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nucleases Acting at Stalled Forks: How to Reboot the Replication Program with a Few Shortcuts.
Pasero P; Vindigni A
Annu Rev Genet; 2017 Nov; 51():477-499. PubMed ID: 29178820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Error-free DNA-damage tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Xu X; Blackwell S; Lin A; Li F; Qin Z; Xiao W
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2015; 764():43-50. PubMed ID: 26041265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EEPD1 Rescues Stressed Replication Forks and Maintains Genome Stability by Promoting End Resection and Homologous Recombination Repair.
Wu Y; Lee SH; Williamson EA; Reinert BL; Cho JH; Xia F; Jaiswal AS; Srinivasan G; Patel B; Brantley A; Zhou D; Shao L; Pathak R; Hauer-Jensen M; Singh S; Kong K; Wu X; Kim HS; Beissbarth T; Gaedcke J; Burma S; Nickoloff JA; Hromas RA
PLoS Genet; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1005675. PubMed ID: 26684013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Building up and breaking down: mechanisms controlling recombination during replication.
Branzei D; Szakal B
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol; 2017 Aug; 52(4):381-394. PubMed ID: 28325102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional and physical interaction of yeast Mgs1 with PCNA: impact on RAD6-dependent DNA damage tolerance.
Hishida T; Ohya T; Kubota Y; Kamada Y; Shinagawa H
Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Jul; 26(14):5509-17. PubMed ID: 16809783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Access to PCNA by Srs2 and Elg1 Controls the Choice between Alternative Repair Pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Arbel M; Bronstein A; Sau S; Liefshitz B; Kupiec M
mBio; 2020 May; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 32371600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rad5 coordinates translesion DNA synthesis pathway by recognizing specific DNA structures in saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Fan Q; Xu X; Zhao X; Wang Q; Xiao W; Guo Y; Fu YV
Curr Genet; 2018 Aug; 64(4):889-899. PubMed ID: 29396601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deletion of ULS1 confers damage tolerance in sgs1 mutants through a Top3-dependent D-loop mediated fork restart pathway.
Glineburg MR; Johns E; Johnson FB
DNA Repair (Amst); 2019 Jun; 78():102-113. PubMed ID: 31005681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rad5 Recruits Error-Prone DNA Polymerases for Mutagenic Repair of ssDNA Gaps on Undamaged Templates.
Gallo D; Kim T; Szakal B; Saayman X; Narula A; Park Y; Branzei D; Zhang Z; Brown GW
Mol Cell; 2019 Mar; 73(5):900-914.e9. PubMed ID: 30733119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Priming for tolerance and cohesion at replication forks.
Branzei D; Szakal B
Nucleus; 2016; 7(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 26889705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple Rad5 activities mediate sister chromatid recombination to bypass DNA damage at stalled replication forks.
Minca EC; Kowalski D
Mol Cell; 2010 Jun; 38(5):649-61. PubMed ID: 20541998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How yeast cells deal with stalled replication forks.
Arbel M; Liefshitz B; Kupiec M
Curr Genet; 2020 Oct; 66(5):911-915. PubMed ID: 32394094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevention of unwanted recombination at damaged replication forks.
Lehmann CP; Jiménez-Martín A; Branzei D; Tercero JA
Curr Genet; 2020 Dec; 66(6):1045-1051. PubMed ID: 32671464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new role for Rrm3 in repair of replication-born DNA breakage by sister chromatid recombination.
Muñoz-Galván S; García-Rubio M; Ortega P; Ruiz JF; Jimeno S; Pardo B; Gómez-González B; Aguilera A
PLoS Genet; 2017 May; 13(5):e1006781. PubMed ID: 28475600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA REPAIR. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage.
Mayle R; Campbell IM; Beck CR; Yu Y; Wilson M; Shaw CA; Bjergbaek L; Lupski JR; Ira G
Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6249):742-7. PubMed ID: 26273056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
