897 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27236302)
61. Cancer Location in Upgrading and Detection after Transperineal Template-Guided Mapping Biopsy for Patients in Active Surveillance and Negative Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy.
Lee CU; Sung SH; Jang CT; Kang M; Sung HH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Jeon HG
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31269509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy.
Arsov C; Becker N; Rabenalt R; Hiester A; Quentin M; Dietzel F; Antoch G; Gabbert HE; Albers P; Schimmöller L
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 141(11):2061-8. PubMed ID: 26013424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI-based risk score for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL.
Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Dwivedi AK; Bora GS; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Gupta SD; Jagannathan NR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 28872226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Transperineal template prostate biopsies in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.
Nafie S; Pal RP; Dormer JP; Khan MA
World J Urol; 2014 Aug; 32(4):971-5. PubMed ID: 24337167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies.
Vourganti S; Rastinehad A; Yerram N; Nix J; Volkin D; Hoang A; Turkbey B; Gupta GN; Kruecker J; Linehan WM; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2152-2157. PubMed ID: 23083875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Comparison of Gleason upgrading rates in transrectal ultrasound systematic random biopsies versus US-MRI fusion biopsies for prostate cancer.
Kayano PP; Carneiro A; Castilho TML; Sivaraman A; Claros OR; Baroni RH; Garcia RG; Mariotti GC; Smaletz O; Filippi RZ; Lemos GC
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(6):1106-1113. PubMed ID: 30325600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Pathological Concordance between Prostate Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy Using Transperineal Sector Mapping Biopsies: Validation and Comparison with Transrectal Biopsies.
Marra G; Eldred-Evans D; Challacombe B; Van Hemelrijck M; Polson A; Pomplun S; Foster CS; Brown C; Cahill D; Gontero P; Popert R; Muir G
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):168-176. PubMed ID: 28768264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Outcomes of transrectal ultrasound scan of the prostate with sector biopsies for 323 New Zealand men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
Smart R
N Z Med J; 1999 Dec; 112(1101):465-9. PubMed ID: 10678211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy.
Sankineni S; George AK; Brown AM; Rais-Bahrami S; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(7):2557-65. PubMed ID: 25916869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?
Schouten MG; van der Leest M; Pokorny M; Hoogenboom M; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 28063613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with prior negative biopsy results.
Abdi H; Zargar H; Goldenberg SL; Walshe T; Pourmalek F; Eddy C; Chang SD; Gleave ME; Harris AC; So AI; Machan L; Black PC
Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):165.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25665509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Impact of real-time elastography on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies.
Brock M; Löppenberg B; Roghmann F; Pelzer A; Dickmann M; Becker W; Martin-Seidel P; Sommerer F; Schenk L; Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; von Bodman C
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1191-7. PubMed ID: 25451832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies to Diagnose Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Enlarged Compared to Smaller Prostates.
de Gorski A; Rouprêt M; Peyronnet B; Le Cossec C; Granger B; Comperat E; Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R; Mozer P
J Urol; 2015 Sep; 194(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 25784374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Improving multiparametric MR-transrectal ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsies with hyperpolarized
Chen HY; Bok RA; Cooperberg MR; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Wang ZJ; Ohliger MA; Gebrezgiabhier D; Carvajal L; Gordon JW; Larson PEZ; Aggarwal R; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Dec; 88(6):2609-2620. PubMed ID: 35975978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in men with previously negative prostate biopsy results.
Lee SH; Chung MS; Kim JH; Oh YT; Rha KH; Chung BH
J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):787-91. PubMed ID: 22122555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Nieboer D; Giganti F; Moore CM; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):946-958. PubMed ID: 29679430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
