437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27236743)
1. Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling After Novel Short-Stem Neck-Sparing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Tran P; Zhang BX; Lade JA; Pianta RM; Unni RP; Haw CS
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2530-2535. PubMed ID: 27236743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Effects of the Metha® Short Stem on Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling in Total Hip Arthroplasties: Results at 48 Months.
Parchi PD; Ciapini G; Castellini I; Mannucci C; Nucci AM; Piolanti N; Maffei S; Lisanti M
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():346-351. PubMed ID: 28277592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Periprosthetic bone remodeling around short stem.
Synder M; Krajewski K; Sibinski M; Drobniewski M
Orthopedics; 2015 Mar; 38(3 Suppl):S40-5. PubMed ID: 25826631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.
Rahmy AI; Gosens T; Blake GM; Tonino A; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14661072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femoral bone remodeling after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a prospective densitometric study.
Hochreiter J; Mattiassich G; Ortmaier R; Steinmair M; Anderl C
Int Orthop; 2020 Apr; 44(4):753-759. PubMed ID: 31965311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Proximal Femoral Bone Mineral Density in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 3-Arm Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hooper G; Thompson D; Frampton C; Lash N; Sharr J; Fulker D; Gilchrist N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Mar; 106(6):508-516. PubMed ID: 38113306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol.
Wu XD; Chen Y; Wang ZY; Li YJ; Zhu ZL; Tao YZ; Chen H; Cheng Q; Huang W
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(39):e12560. PubMed ID: 30278556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Periprosthetic mineral density in cement-free hip replacement arthroplasty].
Reiter A; Sabo D; Simank HG; Büchner T; Seidel M; Lukoschek M
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 9499515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short to Midterm Follow-Up of Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density after Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Ribbed Anatomic Stem.
Wu XD; Tian M; He Y; Chen H; Chen Y; Mishra R; Liu W; Huang W
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():3085258. PubMed ID: 31346514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Daily activity and initial bone mineral density are associated with periprosthetic bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty.
Hayashi S; Hashimoto S; Kanzaki N; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M
Hip Int; 2016; 26(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 27013486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in the bone mineral density in the acetabulum and proximal femur after cementless total hip replacement: alumina-on-alumina versus alumina-on-polyethylene articulation.
Kim YH; Yoon SH; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Feb; 89(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 17322430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Huang Q; Shen B; Yang J; Zhou ZK; Kang PD; Pei FX
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1811-5. PubMed ID: 23618750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of proximal femur bone density in young, active patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty at one year postoperatively.
Nam D; Salih R; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
Hip Int; 2019 Jan; 29(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 29726298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone mineral density as a marker of hip implant longevity: a prospective assessment of a cementless stem with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at twenty years.
Sessa G; Costarella L; Puma Pagliarello C; Di Stefano A; Sessa A; Testa G; Pavone V
Int Orthop; 2019 Jan; 43(1):71-75. PubMed ID: 30284002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study.
Pitto RP; Schramm M; Hohmann D; Schmidt R
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 12025051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of periprosthetic bone mineral density between two types of short-stems in total hip arthroplasty with a mean follow-up of 4 years.
Djebara AE; El Yagoubi A; Mertl P; El Fatayri B; Dehl M; Gabrion A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 108(1):103044. PubMed ID: 34389498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proximal Femur Bone Density Decreases up to 5 Years After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young, Active Patients.
Nam D; Barrack RL; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2825-2830. PubMed ID: 27378640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stem anteversion affects periprosthetic bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty.
Hayashi S; Hashimoto S; Kanzaki N; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M
Hip Int; 2016 May; 26(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 27102558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective cohort study on the short collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem using RSA and DXA. Primary stability but no prevention of proximal bone loss in 27 patients followed for 2 years.
Lazarinis S; Mattsson P; Milbrink J; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
Acta Orthop; 2013 Feb; 84(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 23343375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
