439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27236743)
21. A prospective randomised study of periprosthetic femoral bone remodeling using four different bearings in hybrid total hip arthroplasty.
Zerahn B; Borgwardt L; Ribel-Madsen S; Borgwardt A
Hip Int; 2011; 21(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 21484744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Bone Remodelling in the Proximal Femur after Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoporosis].
Lacko M; Schreierová D; Čellár R; Vaško G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2015; 82(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 26787184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bone remodelling after femoral short stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: 1-year results from a randomized DEXA study.
Freitag T; Hein MA; Wernerus D; Reichel H; Bieger R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Jan; 136(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 26613788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Femoral Bone Mineral Density Changes around 3 Common Designs of Cementless Stems after Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Liu Y; Wei WX; Zeng Y; Ma J; Yang J; Shen B
Orthop Surg; 2022 Jun; 14(6):1059-1070. PubMed ID: 35466536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Yan SG; Weber P; Steinbrück A; Hua X; Jansson V; Schmidutz F
Int Orthop; 2018 Sep; 42(9):2077-2086. PubMed ID: 29178044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lower periprosthetic bone loss and good fixation of an ultra-short stem compared to a conventional stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty.
Salemyr M; Muren O; Ahl T; Bodén H; Eisler T; Stark A; Sköldenberg O
Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 26134386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty with anatomic medullary locking prosthesis and its long-term effectiveness].
Li Y; He R; Zhang Q; An M; Qi H; Ma W; Song X; Sun J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 34(6):689-695. PubMed ID: 32538557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Periprosthetic bone remodeling using a triple-taper polished cemented stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Buckland AJ; Dowsey MM; Stoney JD; Hardidge AJ; Ng KW; Choong PF
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1083-90. PubMed ID: 19879719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis--a prospective 5 year follow-up.
Steens W; Boettner F; Bader R; Skripitz R; Schneeberger A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Aug; 16():192. PubMed ID: 26265062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mid-term gender-specific differences in periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of a curved bone-preserving hip stem.
Meyer JS; Freitag T; Reichel H; Bieger R
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1495-1500. PubMed ID: 33132094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Stem anteversion mismatch to the anatomical anteversion causes loss of periprosthetic bone density after THA.
Hayashi S; Hashimoto S; Matsumoto T; Takayama K; Nishida K; Ishida K; Kuroda R
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(3):2309499017739478. PubMed ID: 29137563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Changes After Implantation of a Curved Bone Preserving Hip Stem Compared to a Standard Length Straight Stem: 5-Yr Results of a Prospective, Randomized DXA-Analysis.
Meyer JS; Freitag T; Reichel H; Bieger R
J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 30126775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is a modular dual mobility acetabulum a viable option for the young, active total hip arthroplasty patient?
Nam D; Salih R; Nahhas CR; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
Bone Joint J; 2019 Apr; 101-B(4):365-371. PubMed ID: 30929489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study of bone remodeling after implantation of the Nanos short-stemmed prosthesis.
Zeh A; Pankow F; Röllinhoff M; Delank S; Wohlrab D
Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Apr; 79(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 23821969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stem length in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty: Does it make a difference in bone remodeling?
Samy AM; El-Tantawy A
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Aug; 29(6):1235-1242. PubMed ID: 30989339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.
Lerch M; von der Haar-Tran A; Windhagen H; Behrens BA; Wefstaedt P; Stukenborg-Colsman CM
Int Orthop; 2012 Mar; 36(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 21935621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Periprosthetic bone mineral density with a cementless triple tapered stem is dependent on daily activity.
Hayashi S; Nishiyama T; Fujishiro T; Kanzaki N; Hashimoto S; Kurosaka M
Int Orthop; 2012 Jun; 36(6):1137-42. PubMed ID: 22127382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction.
Christiansen JD; Ejaz A; Nielsen PT; Laursen M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jan; 102(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 31596796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone Preservation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Anderl C; Steinmair M; Hochreiter J
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1118-1123. PubMed ID: 35121089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]