266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27237958)
1. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
Mossière A; Maeder EM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials.
Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; McLaughlin KJ
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101536. PubMed ID: 32033700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
Jung S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defendant mental illness and juror decision-making: A comparison of sample types.
Mossière A; Maeder EM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():58-66. PubMed ID: 26314888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Insanity defense pleas in Baltimore City: an analysis of outcome.
Janofsky JS; Dunn MH; Roskes EJ; Briskin JK; Rudolph MS
Am J Psychiatry; 1996 Nov; 153(11):1464-8. PubMed ID: 8890682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic and static factors associated with discharge dispositions: the national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder (NCRMD) in Canada.
Crocker AG; Nicholls TL; Charette Y; Seto MC
Behav Sci Law; 2014 Sep; 32(5):577-95. PubMed ID: 25236295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Juror Decision-Making in a Child Trafficking Case: The Impact of Defendant and Victim Gender, Defendant Age, and Defendant Status.
Pica E; Hildenbrand A; Fraser L; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Sep; 38(17-18):10031-10054. PubMed ID: 37096978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Racial Composition of Couples in Battered Spouse Syndrome Cases: A Look at Juror Perceptions and Decisions.
Mossière A; Maeder EM; Pica E
J Interpers Violence; 2018 Sep; 33(18):2867-2890. PubMed ID: 26917572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex and race as factors affecting the attribution of insanity in a murder trial.
McGlynn RP; Megas JC; Benson DH
J Psychol; 1976 May; 93(1st Half):93-9. PubMed ID: 1003337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States.
Maeder EM; McManus LA
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Mental Health and Neuroscience Evidence on Juror Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant: the Moderating Role of Political Orientation.
Mowle EN; Edens JF; Clark JW; Sörman K
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):726-741. PubMed ID: 27620269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.
Rendell JA; Huss MT; Jensen ML
Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 20014145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Putting negative attitudes on the agenda? Not Criminally Responsible Reform Act publicity and juror decision-making.
Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; Zannella L
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):154-159. PubMed ID: 27720501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revisiting the insanity defense: contested or consensus?
Cirincione C
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 8807157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force.
Ewanation L; Maeder EM
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Case of Culture: Defendant Gender and Juror Decision-Making.
Yamamoto S; Maeder EM
J Interpers Violence; 2017 Oct; 32(20):3090-3110. PubMed ID: 26224719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex, sexual orientation, and sexism: what influence do these factors have on verdicts in a crime-of-passion case?
Ragatz LL; Russell B
J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 20718220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
