These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27237958)

  • 21. Not a "Get Out of Jail Free Card": Comparing the Legal Supervision of Persons Found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder and Convicted Offenders.
    Martin S; Charette Y; Leclerc C; Seto MC; Nicholls TL; Crocker AG
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():775480. PubMed ID: 35115962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Juror knowledge and attitudes regarding mental illness verdicts.
    Sloat LM; Frierson RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 15985664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of psychiatry in death penalty defense.
    Beck JC
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 8054675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Culture in the Courtroom: Ethnocentrism and Juror Decision-Making.
    Maeder EM; Yamamoto S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137799. PubMed ID: 26353122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of motive information and crime unusualness on jurors' judgments in insanity cases.
    Pickel KL
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 9833567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Law & psychiatry: imposed insanity defenses and political crimes.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2013 Jan; 64(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 23280453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.
    Melamed Y; Ganot N; Mester R; Bleich A
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2008; 45(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19439834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Failure of All Mothers or the Mother of All Failures? Juror Perceptions of Failure to Protect Laws.
    Stanziani M; Cox J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):NP690-NP711. PubMed ID: 29294952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.
    Devine K; Mojtahedi D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adding Insult to Injury: Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Juror Decision-Making in a Case of Intimate Partner Violence.
    Stanziani M; Cox J; Coffey CA
    J Homosex; 2018; 65(10):1325-1350. PubMed ID: 28854127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
    Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
    Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Motivational influences in persons found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder: a review of legislation and research.
    Penney SR; Morgan A; Simpson AI
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(4):494-505. PubMed ID: 23613184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 2: the people behind the label.
    Crocker AG; Nicholls TL; Seto MC; Charette Y; Côté G; Caulet M
    Can J Psychiatry; 2015 Mar; 60(3):106-16. PubMed ID: 25886686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A third verdict option: exploring the impact of the not proven verdict on mock juror decision making.
    Hope L; Greene E; Memon A; Gavisk M; Houston K
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 17703354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.
    Janofsky JS; Vandewalle MB; Rappeport JR
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2758121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Insanity defenses: contested or conceded?
    Rogers JL; Bloom JD; Manson SM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):885-8. PubMed ID: 6731639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.