BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27237964)

  • 1. Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction.
    Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):322-30. PubMed ID: 27237964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized Crossover Trial of Silicone Hydrogel Presbyopic Contact Lenses.
    Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Feb; 93(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 26704141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early symptomatic presbyopes--what correction modality works best?
    Woods J; Woods CA; Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 19675462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Sha J; Bakaraju RC; Tilia D; Chung J; Delaney S; Munro A; Ehrmann K; Thomas V; Holden BA
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016 Apr; 79(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 27224066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Performance of a Multifocal Contact Lens versus Monovision in Established Presbyopes.
    Woods J; Woods C; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Feb; 92(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 25525891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective and subjective visual performance of multifocal contact lenses: pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Flores M; Gaib S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 24184091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision.
    Gupta N; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E98-105. PubMed ID: 19156009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new method to analyse the effect of multifocal contact lenses on visual function.
    Sanchez I; Ortiz-Toquero S; Blanco M; Martin R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Apr; 41(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 29217455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences.
    Rueff EM; Bailey MD
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):323-328. PubMed ID: 28343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of the visual performance and aberrometric outcomes with a new hybrid and two silicone hydrogel multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Piñero DP; Carracedo G; Ruiz-Fortes P; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 26390908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.
    Guillon M; Maissa C; Cooper P; Girard-Claudon K; Poling TR
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual Performance of Daily-disposable Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Sha J; Tilia D; Kho D; Amrizal H; Diec J; Yeotikar N; Jong M; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1096-1104. PubMed ID: 30451806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptation to multifocal and monovision contact lens correction.
    Fernandes PR; Neves HI; Lopes-Ferreira DP; Jorge JM; González-Meijome JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 23376896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.