These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27238052)

  • 1. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation.
    van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2017 Aug; 125(4):303-309. PubMed ID: 28524243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Durability of a low shrinkage TEGDMA/HEMA-free resin composite system in Class II restorations. A 6-year follow up.
    van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2017 Aug; 33(8):944-953. PubMed ID: 28545657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity.
    van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U; Benetti A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Feb; 35(2):335-343. PubMed ID: 30527586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
    Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1371-9. PubMed ID: 25359327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 3-year retrospective study of clinical durability of bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
    Ugurlu M; Sari F
    Restor Dent Endod; 2022 Feb; 47(1):e5. PubMed ID: 35284329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Loguercio AD; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Gutierrez MF; Gonzalez MI; Reis A; Heintze SD
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 37839995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Rezende M; Gutierrez MF; Costa TF; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
    J Dent; 2019 Jun; 85():93-102. PubMed ID: 31100332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flowable bulk-fill versus layering restorative material on Class II restorations: A randomized clinical trial.
    Torres CRG; Mailart MC; Moecke SE; Matuda AGN; Veloso SM; da Silva Ávila DM; Nicoló RD; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105154. PubMed ID: 38942111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original Laboratory Experimental Study.
    Al-Nahedh HN
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):342-348. PubMed ID: 34267000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 6-year prospective evaluation of a one-step HEMA-free self-etching adhesive in Class II restorations.
    van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1116-22. PubMed ID: 24011496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.