These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27238052)

  • 41. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in posterior cavities.
    Van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 16430017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical effectiveness of a low-shrinkage resin composite: a five-year evaluation.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Apr; 11(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 19492716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Veloso SRM; Lemos CAA; de Moraes SLD; do Egito Vasconcelos BC; Pellizzer EP; de Melo Monteiro GQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jan; 23(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 29594349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in medium- and large size direct class II restorations using a bulk-fill or layering technique.
    Dietschi D; Curto FD; Di Bella E; Krejci I; Ardu S
    J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103828. PubMed ID: 34678337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
    Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical Evaluation of Sonic-Activated High Viscosity Bulk-Fill Nanohybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities: A Prospective Clinical Study up to 2 Years.
    Akalιn TT; Bozkurt FO; Kusdemir M; Özsoy A; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):152-160. PubMed ID: 30063305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Does a Self-adhesive Flowable Resin Composite Perform Similarly to Highly Filled and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites in Occlusal Cavities? A 2-year Follow-up Study.
    Oz FD; Meral E; Gurgan S
    J Adhes Dent; 2021 Dec; 23(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 34817965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1060-7. PubMed ID: 22955004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
    Afifi SMH; Haridy MF; Farid MR
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 7(14):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 31592052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites.
    Bayraktar Y; Ercan E; Hamidi MM; Çolak H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 26800647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
    Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation.
    Stefanski S; van Dijken JW
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 21104100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.
    Yazici AR; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Karahan S; Antonson SA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):417-426. PubMed ID: 34110494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities.
    Gurgan S; Kutuk ZB; Yalcin Cakir F; Ergin E
    J Dent; 2020 Mar; 94():103175. PubMed ID: 31351909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Bulk-fill versus layering pure ormocer posterior restorations: A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
    Torres CR; Jurema AL; Souza MY; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    Am J Dent; 2021 Jun; 34(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 34143584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Thirty-six month clinical evaluation of a highly filled flowable composite for direct posterior restorations.
    Kitasako Y; Sadr A; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Aust Dent J; 2016 Sep; 61(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 26573239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.