These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27238631)

  • 1. Assessing validity of observational intervention studies - the Benchmarking Controlled Trials.
    Malmivaara A
    Ann Med; 2016 Sep; 48(6):440-443. PubMed ID: 27238631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking Controlled Trial--a novel concept covering all observational effectiveness studies.
    Malmivaara A
    Ann Med; 2015 Jun; 47(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 25965700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Impact Research - how to choose experimental or observational intervention study?
    Malmivaara A
    Ann Med; 2016 Nov; 48(7):492-495. PubMed ID: 27494394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. System impact research - increasing public health and health care system performance.
    Malmivaara A
    Ann Med; 2016; 48(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 26977939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pros and Cons of Randomized Controlled Trials and Benchmarking Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation: An Academic Debate within the European Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine.
    Malmivaara A; Zampolini M; Stam H; Gutenbrunner C
    J Rehabil Med; 2022 Oct; 54():jrm00319. PubMed ID: 35797064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The GRACE Checklist: A Validated Assessment Tool for High Quality Observational Studies of Comparative Effectiveness.
    Dreyer NA; Bryant A; Velentgas P
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2016 Oct; 22(10):1107-13. PubMed ID: 27668559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.
    Downs SH; Black N
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Jun; 52(6):377-84. PubMed ID: 9764259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness clinical trials to advance treatment of myasthenia gravis.
    Guptill JT; Raja S; Sanders DB; Narayanaswami P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Feb; 1413(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29377158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmarking Observational Analyses Against Randomized Trials: a Review of Studies Assessing Propensity Score Methods.
    Forbes SP; Dahabreh IJ
    J Gen Intern Med; 2020 May; 35(5):1396-1404. PubMed ID: 32193818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing treatment effects in the "real world".
    Jones AS; Shinogle JA
    Clin Ther; 2010 Oct; 32(11):1952-3. PubMed ID: 21095489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quality of reporting of orthopaedic randomized trials with use of a checklist for nonpharmacological therapies.
    Chan S; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1970-8. PubMed ID: 17768194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adherence to CONSORT Items in Randomized Controlled Trials of Integrative Medicine for Colorectal Cancer Published in Chinese Journals.
    Chen M; Cui J; Zhang AL; Sze DM; Xue CC; May BH
    J Altern Complement Med; 2018 Feb; 24(2):115-124. PubMed ID: 29068694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 1. Introduction.
    Zuidgeest MGP; Goetz I; Groenwold RHH; Irving E; van Thiel GJMW; Grobbee DE;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():7-13. PubMed ID: 28549929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of piloting an RCT intervention.
    Feeley N; Cossette S; Côté J; Héon M; Stremler R; Martorella G; Purden M
    Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Jun; 41(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 19650515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized controlled trials vs. observational studies: why not just live together?
    Faraoni D; Schaefer ST
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 27769172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative effectiveness research in cancer with observational data.
    Giordano SH
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2015; ():e330-5. PubMed ID: 25993193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considerations for co-enrolment in randomised controlled effectiveness trials in critical care: the SPICE-8 co-enrolment guidelines.
    Reade MC; Bass F; Howe B; Seppelt I; Shehabi Y
    Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Jun; 19(2):110-114. PubMed ID: 28651505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.