297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27238749)
21. Skull Modeling Effects in Conductivity Estimates Using Parametric Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Luu P; Price N; Muravchik CH; Tucker D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1785-1797. PubMed ID: 29989921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Brainstorm-DUNEuro: An integrated and user-friendly Finite Element Method for modeling electromagnetic brain activity.
Medani T; Garcia-Prieto J; Tadel F; Antonakakis M; Erdbrügger T; Höltershinken M; Mead W; Schrader S; Joshi A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Mosher JC; Leahy RM
Neuroimage; 2023 Feb; 267():119851. PubMed ID: 36599389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A systematic study of head tissue inhomogeneity and anisotropy on EEG forward problem computing.
Bashar MR; Li Y; Wen P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Mar; 33(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20333564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of tissue dielectric properties on the electric field induced in tDCS: a sensitivity analysis.
Salvador R; Ramirez F; V'yacheslavovna M; Miranda PC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():787-90. PubMed ID: 23366010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In Vivo Estimation of Head Tissue Conductivities Using Bound Constrained Optimization.
Ouypornkochagorn T; Ouypornkochagorn S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30927169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computational representation of a realistic head and brain volume conductor model: electroencephalography simulation and visualization study.
Kybartaite A
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1144-55. PubMed ID: 23109383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model.
Wen P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Experimental validation of the influence of white matter anisotropy on the intracranial EEG forward solution.
Bangera NB; Schomer DL; Dehghani N; Ulbert I; Cash S; Papavasiliou S; Eisenberg SR; Dale AM; Halgren E
J Comput Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 29(3):371-87. PubMed ID: 20063051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of skull modeling approaches on EEG source localization.
Montes-Restrepo V; van Mierlo P; Strobbe G; Staelens S; Vandenberghe S; Hallez H
Brain Topogr; 2014 Jan; 27(1):95-111. PubMed ID: 24002699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the electric field in the brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: A sensitivity analysis.
Santos L; Martinho M; Salvador R; Wenger C; Fernandes SR; Ripolles O; Ruffini G; Miranda PC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1778-1781. PubMed ID: 28268672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-layer-isotropic skull conductivity representation in the EEG forward problem using spherical head models.
Cuartas-Morales E; Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Castellanos-Dominguez G
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():4904-7. PubMed ID: 25571091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Forward and inverse effects of the complete electrode model in neonatal EEG.
Pursiainen S; Lew S; Wolters CH
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):876-884. PubMed ID: 27852731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The role of blood vessels in high-resolution volume conductor head modeling of EEG.
Fiederer LDJ; Vorwerk J; Lucka F; Dannhauer M; Yang S; Dümpelmann M; Schulze-Bonhage A; Aertsen A; Speck O; Wolters CH; Ball T
Neuroimage; 2016 Mar; 128():193-208. PubMed ID: 26747748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Five-layer realistic finite element head models based on segmented computer tomography data].
Zhang J; Wu W; Ying X; Yan D
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 28(3):587-91. PubMed ID: 21774229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Role of soft bone, CSF and gray matter in EEG simulations.
Ramon C; Schimpf P; Haueisen J; Holmes M; Ishimaru A
Brain Topogr; 2004; 16(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 15379221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Enhanced tES and tDCS computational models by meninges emulation.
Jiang J; Truong DQ; Esmaeilpour Z; Huang Y; Badran BW; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2020 Jan; 17(1):016027. PubMed ID: 31689695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
