These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Effects of diameter, chemical impregnation and hydration on the tensile strength of gingival retraction cords. Del Rocío Nieto-Martínez M; Maupomé G; Barceló-Santana F J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 28(12):1094-100. PubMed ID: 11874507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. Liu CM; Huang FM; Yang LC; Chou LS; Chou MY; Chang YC J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 15089944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Three-dimensional model analysis of the gingival sulcus width from different retraction time]. Zhang Jj; Liu Yh; Lv Pj; Zhao Yj Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Feb; 43(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 21321624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions. Cloyd S; Puri S Dent Today; 1999 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10765795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Gingival Retraction Materials Using a New Gingival Sulcus Model. Dederichs M; Fahmy MD; Kuepper H; Guentsch A J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):784-789. PubMed ID: 31206914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of retraction materials on the blood supply of marginal gingiva]. Fazekas A; Csabai Z; Csempesz F; Vág J Fogorv Sz; 2000 Oct; 93(10):289-96. PubMed ID: 11084773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin. Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies]. Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis]. Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impression taking: still the key to great restorations. Miller MB Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):452-3. PubMed ID: 23220297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Kinetic study of the liquid uptake of retraction cords]. Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A Fogorv Sz; 2002 Aug; 95(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 12236091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of fast-setting impression materials in the reproduction of subgingival tooth surfaces without soft tissue retraction. Rudolph H; Röhl A; Walter MH; Luthardt RG; Quaas S Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 25010882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epinephrine absorption from commercial gingival retraction cords in clinical patients. Kellam SA; Smith JR; Scheffel SJ J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):761-5. PubMed ID: 1432796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a cordless retraction paste on titanium surface: a topographic, chemical and biocompatibility evaluation. Cooper K; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Reid M; Stirling C; Dias G Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 23739788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]