145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27240421)
1. The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final test cues in online and laboratory experiments.
Coppens LC; Verkoeijen PP; Bouwmeester S; Rikers RM
BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):25. PubMed ID: 27240421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates?
Cho KW; Neely JH; Brennan MK; Vitrano D; Crocco S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1768-1778. PubMed ID: 28394159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transfer of Test-Enhanced Learning.
DiMarco D; Marmurek H
Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):119-131. PubMed ID: 35975624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.
Carpenter SK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1547-52. PubMed ID: 21707217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrieval activates related words more than presentation.
Hausman H; Rhodes MG
Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1265-1280. PubMed ID: 29571266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Depth of Encoding on the Transfer of Test Enhanced Learning.
DiMarco D; Marmurek H
Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 69(5):267-274. PubMed ID: 36655885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
Carpenter SK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Item Difficulty Affect the Magnitude of the Retrieval Practice Effect? An Evaluation of the Retrieval Effort Hypothesis.
Lima MFR; Venâncio S; Feminella J; Buratto LG
Span J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 23():e31. PubMed ID: 32772963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of mediators for the pretesting effect.
Bartl J; Kliegl O; Bäuml KT
Memory; 2024 Mar; 32(3):358-368. PubMed ID: 38427707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.
Carpenter SK; DeLosh EL
Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 16752591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practicing more retrieval routes leads to greater memory retention.
Zheng J; Zhang W; Li T; Liu Z; Luo L
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():109-18. PubMed ID: 27270228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elaborative retrieval: Do semantic mediators improve memory?
Lehman M; Karpicke JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1573-1591. PubMed ID: 26974674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the effects of testing and restudying on recollection in recognition memory.
Verkoeijen PP; Tabbers HK; Verhage ML
Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 21768063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits of testing for nontested information: retrieval-induced facilitation of episodically bound material.
Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1516-23. PubMed ID: 24671778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis.
Rawson KA; Vaughn KE; Carpenter SK
Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):619-33. PubMed ID: 25344296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning from errors is attributable to episodic recollection rather than semantic mediation.
Metcalfe J; Huelser BJ
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107296. PubMed ID: 31811845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics.
Hannon B; Craik FI
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 11605558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall and recognition of thematically related and unrelated sentences.
Gómez-Ariza CJ; Lechuga MT; Pelegrina S; Bajo MT
Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1431-41. PubMed ID: 16615391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
