BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27240421)

  • 21. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects.
    Whiffen JW; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 28080119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):953-8. PubMed ID: 23088549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Making remembering more memorable.
    Leppanen ML; Lyle KB
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):960-973. PubMed ID: 29291672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing an associative account of semantic satiation.
    Tian X; Huber DE
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Jun; 60(4):267-90. PubMed ID: 20156620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
    Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of retrieval practice and presentation modality on verbal learning: testing the limits of the testing effect.
    Wilkinson AM; Hall ACG; Hogan EE
    Memory; 2019 Sep; 27(8):1144-1157. PubMed ID: 31234716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Encoding and cuing sounds and senses.
    Nelson DL; Friedrich MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Nov; 6(6):717-31. PubMed ID: 7441188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enhancing visuospatial learning: the benefit of retrieval practice.
    Kang SH
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1009-17. PubMed ID: 21156865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Behavioral representational similarity analysis reveals how episodic learning is influenced by and reshapes semantic memory.
    Walsh CR; Rissman J
    Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7548. PubMed ID: 37985774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The semantic representation of event information depends on the cue modality: an instance of meaning-based retrieval.
    Karlsson K; Sikström S; Willander J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e73378. PubMed ID: 24204561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrieval-induced forgetting: testing the competition assumption of inhibition theory.
    Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 22506876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Errors may not cue recall of corrective feedback: Evidence against the mediation hypothesis of the testing effect.
    Leggett JMI; Burt JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 31944809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrieval-mediated directed forgetting in the item-method paradigm: the effect of semantic cues.
    Marevic I; Rummel J
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):685-705. PubMed ID: 30155734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differentiation of subsequent memory effects between retrieval practice and elaborative study.
    Liu Y; Rosburg T; Gao C; Weber C; Guo C
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jul; 127():134-147. PubMed ID: 28552619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does mediator use contribute to the spacing effect for cued recall? Critical tests of the mediator hypothesis.
    Morehead K; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA; Bishop M; Pyc MA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):535-546. PubMed ID: 28978279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Progressive retrieval practice leads to greater memory for image-word pairs than standard retrieval practice.
    Liu S; Zheng Z; Kent C; Briscoe J
    Memory; 2022 Aug; 30(7):796-805. PubMed ID: 35638593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.