140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27240505)
1. Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of Arabic SNAP test for children with hypernasality.
Abou-Elsaad T; Afsah O; Baz H; Mansy A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 85():99-102. PubMed ID: 27240505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardization of nasometry for normal Egyptian Arabic speakers.
Abou-Elsaad T; Quriba A; Baz H; Elkassaby R
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(6):271-7. PubMed ID: 23328484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The nature of articulation errors in Egyptian Arabic-speaking children with velopharyngeal insufficiency due to cleft palate.
Abou-Elsaad T; Baz H; Afsah O; Mansy A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1527-32. PubMed ID: 26209352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting speech in patients with isolated cleft palate. A methodic, clinical and instrumental study.
Haapanen ML
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg Suppl; 1992; 26():1-61. PubMed ID: 1486205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objectivating nasality in healthy and velopharyngeal insufficient children with the Nasalance Acquisition System (NasalView). Defining minimal required speech tasks assessing normative values for Dutch language.
Hogen Esch TT; Dejonckere PH
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 68(8):1039-46. PubMed ID: 15236890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction.
Sweeney T; Sell D
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(3):265-82. PubMed ID: 17852526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production.
Garcia AF; Marino VC; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Guerra TA; Lauris JR; Dutka Jde C
Codas; 2014; 26(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 25388073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of cleft type on overall speech intelligibility and resonance.
Van Lierde KM; De Bodt M; Van Borsel J; Wuyts FL; Van Cauwenberge P
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):158-68. PubMed ID: 12077507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nasometric evaluation of resonance disorders: A norm study In Turkish.
Ünal-Logacev Ö; Kummer AW; Çetin C; Topbaş S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109888. PubMed ID: 31981919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual evaluation of speech and velopharyngeal function in children with and without cleft palate and the relationship to nasal airflow patterns.
Dotevall H; Lohmander-Agerskov A; Ejnell H; Bake B
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Jul; 39(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 12071789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use.
Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of pharyngeal flap surgery on nasality and nasalance scores of nasal sounds production in individuals with cleft lip and palate.
Fukushiro AP; Ferlin F; Yamashita RP; Trindade IE
Codas; 2015; 27(6):584-7. PubMed ID: 26691623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech evaluation of velopharyngeal dysfunction.
Smith BE; Kuehn DP
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 18(2):251-61; quiz 266-7. PubMed ID: 17414269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal Patterns of Nasometric Values in Adult Jordanian Speakers of Arabic.
Khwaileh FA; Alfwaress FSD
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2043-2047. PubMed ID: 30015743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Speech and Resonance for Children with Craniofacial Anomalies.
Kummer AW
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2016 Nov; 24(4):445-451. PubMed ID: 27712812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment.
Dalston RM; Warren DW; Dalston ET
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Apr; 28(2):184-8; discussion 188-9. PubMed ID: 2069975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of speech nasality in children with Robin Sequence.
Prado-Oliveira R; Marques IL; Souza Ld; Souza-Brosco TV; Dutka Jde C
Codas; 2015; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25885197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality.
Hardin MA; Van Demark DR; Morris HL; Payne MM
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jul; 29(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 1643065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
