These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27240505)

  • 21. Correlation between the perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and composite measures derived from mean nasalance scores.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15087571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers.
    El-Kassabi RM; Hassan S; Mesallam TA; Malki KH; Farahat M; Alfaris A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Jul; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 24854781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nasalance Scores for Normal Speakers of American English Obtained by the Nasometer II Using the MacKay-Kummer SNAP-R Test.
    Alfwaress F; Kummer AW; Weinrich B
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Jun; 59(6):765-773. PubMed ID: 34184583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validity of test stimuli for nasalance measurement in speakers of Jordanian Arabic.
    Khwaileh FA; Alfwaress FSD; Kummer AW; Alrawashdeh M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Oct; 43(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 28879790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech evaluation for patients with cleft palate.
    Kummer AW
    Clin Plast Surg; 2014 Apr; 41(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 24607192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Quantitative diagnosis of hypernasality in cleft lip and palate patients by computerized nasal quality assessment].
    Bressmann T; Sader R; Awan S; Busch R; Zeilhofer HF; Horch HH
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 May; 3 Suppl 1():S154-7. PubMed ID: 10414105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Articulation and nasality changes resulting from sustained palatal fistula obturation.
    Pinborough-Zimmerman J; Canady C; Yamashiro DK; Morales L
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jan; 35(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 9482228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relationship between the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 and perceptual judgments of hypernasality.
    Bettens K; De Bodt M; Maryn Y; Luyten A; Wuyts FL; Van Lierde KM
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 62():67-81. PubMed ID: 27310727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of hypertrophied tonsils on the velopharyngeal function in children with normal palate.
    Abdel-Aziz M; El-Fouly M; Nassar A; Kamel A; Kamel A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 119():59-62. PubMed ID: 30677628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Superiorly based pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal insufficiency: intermediate and longer-term perceptual speech and nasometric outcomes.
    Nabi S; Tan S; Husein M; Dworschak-Stokan A; Bureau Y; Matic D
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 21453652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nasalance and nasality in low pressure and high pressure speech.
    Watterson T; Lewis KE; Deutsch C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jul; 35(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 9684765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of linear discriminant analysis to the nasometric assessment of resonance disorders: a pilot study.
    de Boer G; Bressmann T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Mar; 52(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 25714268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of nasalance and nasality in patients with a repaired cleft palate.
    Sinko K; Gruber M; Jagsch R; Roesner I; Baumann A; Wutzl A; Denk-Linnert DM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 274(7):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 28299425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality.
    Lewis KE; Watterson TL; Houghton SM
    J Commun Disord; 2003; 36(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12493637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cleft type and speech proficiency.
    Haapanen ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1994; 46(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 8173613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of gender and age on the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 in Dutch-speaking Flemish children and adults.
    Bettens K; Wuyts FL; Jonckheere L; Platbrood S; Van Lierde K
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Oct; 42(3):133-140. PubMed ID: 27841710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults.
    Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 11294538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow.
    Karnell MP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Mar; 32(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 7748876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Immediate effects of voice focus adjustments on hypernasal speakers' nasalance scores.
    Santoni C; Thaut M; Bressmann T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110107. PubMed ID: 32480137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Normal nasalance for the German language. Nasometric values for clinical use in patients with cleft lip and palate].
    Küttner C; Schönweiler R; Seeberger B; Dempf R; Lisson J; Ptok M
    HNO; 2003 Feb; 51(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 12589422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.