These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27241618)

  • 1. On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations.
    Lakens D; Hilgard J; Staaks J
    BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):24. PubMed ID: 27241618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology.
    Maassen E; van Assen MALM; Nuijten MB; Olsson-Collentine A; Wicherts JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233107. PubMed ID: 32459806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strategies to improve the credibility of meta-analyses in spine surgery: a systematic survey.
    Evaniew N; van der Watt L; Bhandari M; Ghert M; Aleem I; Drew B; Guyatt G
    Spine J; 2015 Sep; 15(9):2066-76. PubMed ID: 26002725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
    van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
    Schmucker CM; Blümle A; Schell LK; Schwarzer G; Oeller P; Cabrera L; von Elm E; Briel M; Meerpohl JJ;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176210. PubMed ID: 28441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Null and Void? Errors in Meta-analysis on Perceptual Disfluency and Recommendations to Improve Meta-analytical Reproducibility.
    Weissgerber SC; Brunmair M; Rummer R
    Educ Psychol Rev; 2021; 33(3):1221-1247. PubMed ID: 33551625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the quality of the implemented meta-analytic procedures in chronic pain treatment meta-analyses?
    Fishbain D; Cutler RB; Rosomoff HL; Rosomoff RS
    Clin J Pain; 2000 Mar; 16(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 10741821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000-2020).
    López-Nicolás R; López-López JA; Rubio-Aparicio M; Sánchez-Meca J
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):334-349. PubMed ID: 34173943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations.
    Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Big of a Problem is Analytic Error in Secondary Analyses of Survey Data?
    West BT; Sakshaug JW; Aurelien GA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158120. PubMed ID: 27355817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
    van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.