These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2724166)

  • 1. Alternative materials for three endosseous implants.
    Rieger MR; Adams WK; Kinzel GL; Brose MO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jun; 61(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 2724166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants.
    Rieger MR; Fareed K; Adams WK; Tanquist RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 2654367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. I. Effect of elastic parameters and geometry of implant.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H; Schoen FJ
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1979; 7(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 378283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Restorative Configurations and Occlusal Schemes on Strain Levels in Bone Surrounding Implants.
    Block J; Matalon S; Tanase G; Ormianer Z
    Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):574-580. PubMed ID: 28692444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part I.
    Gross MD; Nissan J; Samuel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 11357069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis.
    Bozkaya D; Muftu S; Muftu A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 15583556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques.
    Brosh T; Pilo R; Sudai D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Mar; 79(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 9553888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant.
    Clelland NL; Ismail YH; Zaki HS; Pipko D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 1820307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone-implant interface structures after nontapping and tapping insertion of screw-type titanium alloy endosseous implants.
    Satomi K; Akagawa Y; Nikai H; Tsuru H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Mar; 59(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 3162274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of stress distribution of bone around the implant on vertical loads].
    Shi B; Zhou ZM
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 May; 39(3):224-6. PubMed ID: 15196392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. I. Effect of elastic parameters and geometry of implant.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H
    Implantologist; 1983-1984; 3(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 6386667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A parametric finite element analysis study of the stresses in an endosseous implant.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(7):495-502. PubMed ID: 7881333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants.
    Rieger MR; Mayberry M; Brose MO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jun; 63(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 2362246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants.
    Holmes DC; Loftus JT
    J Oral Implantol; 1997; 23(3):104-11. PubMed ID: 9477847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants--a biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study].
    Mailath G; Stoiber B; Watzek G; Matejka M
    Z Stomatol; 1989 Jun; 86(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 2638071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis.
    Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.