These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2724166)
21. Fracture Resistance of Internal Conical and External Hexagon: Regular and Narrow Implant-Abutment Assemblies. Carneiro Tde A; Dietrich L; Prudente MS; da Silva Neto JP; do Prado CJ; De Araújo CA; das Neves FD Implant Dent; 2016 Aug; 25(4):510-4. PubMed ID: 27280738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies. Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws. Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bone ingrowth and initial stability of titanium and porous tantalum dental implants: a pilot canine study. Kim DG; Huja SS; Tee BC; Larsen PE; Kennedy KS; Chien HH; Lee JW; Wen HB Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 23823737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries. Versluis A; Kim HC; Lee W; Kim BM; Lee CJ J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1399-403. PubMed ID: 22980187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical Consequences of the Elastic Properties of Dental Implant Alloys on the Supporting Bone: Finite Element Analysis. Pérez-Pevida E; Brizuela-Velasco A; Chávarri-Prado D; Jiménez-Garrudo A; Sánchez-Lasheras F; Solaberrieta-Méndez E; Diéguez-Pereira M; Fernández-González FJ; Dehesa-Ibarra B; Monticelli F Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():1850401. PubMed ID: 27995137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach. Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload. Lang LA; Kang B; Wang RF; Lang BR J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 14668754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study. Ganeles J; Zöllner A; Jackowski J; ten Bruggenkate C; Beagle J; Guerra F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1119-28. PubMed ID: 18983314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation. Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration. Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interaction of bone-dental implant with new ultra low modulus alloy using a numerical approach. Piotrowski B; Baptista AA; Patoor E; Bravetti P; Eberhardt A; Laheurte P Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 May; 38():151-60. PubMed ID: 24656363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mechanical strength and fracture point of a dental implant under certification conditions: A numerical approach by finite element analysis. de la Rosa Castolo G; Guevara Perez SV; Arnoux PJ; Badih L; Bonnet F; Behr M J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):611-619. PubMed ID: 28720340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative histologic evaluation of LTI carbon, carbon-coated aluminum oxide and uncoated aluminum oxide dental implants. Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Kent JN J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 6863353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height. Hedia HS Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12122235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. Rieger MR; Adams WK; Kinzel GL J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Apr; 63(4):457-65. PubMed ID: 2184232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis. Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]