509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27242363)
1. WRNIP1 protects stalled forks from degradation and promotes fork restart after replication stress.
Leuzzi G; Marabitti V; Pichierri P; Franchitto A
EMBO J; 2016 Jul; 35(13):1437-51. PubMed ID: 27242363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. WRNIP1: A new guardian of genome integrity at stalled replication forks.
Leuzzi G; Marabitti V; Pichierri P; Franchitto A
Mol Cell Oncol; 2016; 3(5):e1215777. PubMed ID: 27857978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. WRNIP1 Protects Reversed DNA Replication Forks from SLX4-Dependent Nucleolytic Cleavage.
Porebski B; Wild S; Kummer S; Scaglione S; Gaillard PL; Gari K
iScience; 2019 Nov; 21():31-41. PubMed ID: 31654852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lamin A/C recruits ssDNA protective proteins RPA and RAD51 to stalled replication forks to maintain fork stability.
Graziano S; Coll-Bonfill N; Teodoro-Castro B; Kuppa S; Jackson J; Shashkova E; Mahajan U; Vindigni A; Antony E; Gonzalo S
J Biol Chem; 2021 Nov; 297(5):101301. PubMed ID: 34648766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of Brca2 and Stable Rad51 Nucleofilaments.
Kolinjivadi AM; Sannino V; De Antoni A; Zadorozhny K; Kilkenny M; Técher H; Baldi G; Shen R; Ciccia A; Pellegrini L; Krejci L; Costanzo V
Mol Cell; 2017 Sep; 67(5):867-881.e7. PubMed ID: 28757209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abro1 maintains genome stability and limits replication stress by protecting replication fork stability.
Xu S; Wu X; Wu L; Castillo A; Liu J; Atkinson E; Paul A; Su D; Schlacher K; Komatsu Y; You MJ; Wang B
Genes Dev; 2017 Jul; 31(14):1469-1482. PubMed ID: 28860160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.
Mijic S; Zellweger R; Chappidi N; Berti M; Jacobs K; Mutreja K; Ursich S; Ray Chaudhuri A; Nussenzweig A; Janscak P; Lopes M
Nat Commun; 2017 Oct; 8(1):859. PubMed ID: 29038466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BOD1L Is Required to Suppress Deleterious Resection of Stressed Replication Forks.
Higgs MR; Reynolds JJ; Winczura A; Blackford AN; Borel V; Miller ES; Zlatanou A; Nieminuszczy J; Ryan EL; Davies NJ; Stankovic T; Boulton SJ; Niedzwiedz W; Stewart GS
Mol Cell; 2015 Aug; 59(3):462-77. PubMed ID: 26166705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells.
Thangavel S; Berti M; Levikova M; Pinto C; Gomathinayagam S; Vujanovic M; Zellweger R; Moore H; Lee EH; Hendrickson EA; Cejka P; Stewart S; Lopes M; Vindigni A
J Cell Biol; 2015 Mar; 208(5):545-62. PubMed ID: 25733713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ATAD5 promotes replication restart by regulating RAD51 and PCNA in response to replication stress.
Park SH; Kang N; Song E; Wie M; Lee EA; Hwang S; Lee D; Ra JS; Park IB; Park J; Kang S; Park JH; Hohng S; Lee KY; Myung K
Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5718. PubMed ID: 31844045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. BAP1 promotes stalled fork restart and cell survival via INO80 in response to replication stress.
Lee HS; Seo HR; Lee SA; Choi S; Kang D; Kwon J
Biochem J; 2019 Oct; 476(20):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 31657441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PDS5 proteins are required for proper cohesin dynamics and participate in replication fork protection.
Morales C; Ruiz-Torres M; Rodríguez-Acebes S; Lafarga V; Rodríguez-Corsino M; Megías D; Cisneros DA; Peters JM; Méndez J; Losada A
J Biol Chem; 2020 Jan; 295(1):146-157. PubMed ID: 31757807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CtIP mediates replication fork recovery in a FANCD2-regulated manner.
Yeo JE; Lee EH; Hendrickson EA; Sobeck A
Hum Mol Genet; 2014 Jul; 23(14):3695-705. PubMed ID: 24556218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rad52 prevents excessive replication fork reversal and protects from nascent strand degradation.
Malacaria E; Pugliese GM; Honda M; Marabitti V; Aiello FA; Spies M; Franchitto A; Pichierri P
Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1412. PubMed ID: 30926821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. RADX Modulates RAD51 Activity to Control Replication Fork Protection.
Bhat KP; Krishnamoorthy A; Dungrawala H; Garcin EB; Modesti M; Cortez D
Cell Rep; 2018 Jul; 24(3):538-545. PubMed ID: 30021152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deletion of BRCA2 exon 27 causes defects in response to both stalled and collapsed replication forks.
Kim TM; Son MY; Dodds S; Hu L; Hasty P
Mutat Res; 2014; 766-767():66-72. PubMed ID: 25847274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair.
Petermann E; Orta ML; Issaeva N; Schultz N; Helleday T
Mol Cell; 2010 Feb; 37(4):492-502. PubMed ID: 20188668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-enzymatic roles of human RAD51 at stalled replication forks.
Mason JM; Chan YL; Weichselbaum RW; Bishop DK
Nat Commun; 2019 Sep; 10(1):4410. PubMed ID: 31562309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deletion of BRCA2 exon 27 causes defects in response to both stalled and collapsed replication forks.
Kim TM; Son MY; Dodds S; Hu L; Hasty P
Mutat Res; 2014; 766-767():66-72. PubMed ID: 25773776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RADX prevents genome instability by confining replication fork reversal to stalled forks.
Krishnamoorthy A; Jackson J; Mohamed T; Adolph M; Vindigni A; Cortez D
Mol Cell; 2021 Jul; 81(14):3007-3017.e5. PubMed ID: 34107305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
