286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27242395)
1. An Efficient and Reliable Statistical Method for Estimating Functional Connectivity in Large Scale Brain Networks Using Partial Correlation.
Wang Y; Kang J; Kemmer PB; Guo Y
Front Neurosci; 2016; 10():123. PubMed ID: 27242395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of functional connectivity in fMRI data using stability selection-based sparse partial correlation with elastic net penalty.
Ryali S; Chen T; Supekar K; Menon V
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(4):3852-61. PubMed ID: 22155039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing group differences in brain functional connectivity: using correlations or partial correlations?
Kim J; Wozniak JR; Mueller BA; Pan W
Brain Connect; 2015 May; 5(4):214-31. PubMed ID: 25492804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting individual brain functional connectivity using a Bayesian hierarchical model.
Dai T; Guo Y;
Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():772-787. PubMed ID: 27915121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SPARK: Sparsity-based analysis of reliable k-hubness and overlapping network structure in brain functional connectivity.
Lee K; Lina JM; Gotman J; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():434-449. PubMed ID: 27046111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning Brain Connectivity Sub-networks by Group- Constrained Sparse Inverse Covariance Estimation for Alzheimer's Disease Classification.
Li Y; Liu J; Huang J; Li Z; Liang P
Front Neuroinform; 2018; 12():58. PubMed ID: 30258358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sparse Graphical Models for Functional Connectivity Networks: Best Methods and the Autocorrelation Issue.
Zhu Y; Cribben I
Brain Connect; 2018 Apr; 8(3):139-165. PubMed ID: 29634321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation and calibration of functional network modeling methods based on known anatomical connections.
Dawson DA; Cha K; Lewis LB; Mendola JD; Shmuel A
Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 67():331-43. PubMed ID: 23153969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Partial Correlation-Based Retinotopically Organized Resting-State Functional Connectivity Within and Between Areas of the Visual Cortex Reflects More Than Cortical Distance.
Dawson DA; Lam J; Lewis LB; Carbonell F; Mendola JD; Shmuel A
Brain Connect; 2016 Feb; 6(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 26415043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of brain functional connectivity network in MS patients constructed by modular structure of sparse weights from cognitive task-related fMRI.
Miri Ashtiani SN; Behnam H; Daliri MR; Hossein-Zadeh GA; Mehrpour M
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Dec; 42(4):921-938. PubMed ID: 31452057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Highly adaptive tests for group differences in brain functional connectivity.
Kim J; Pan W;
Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 9():625-39. PubMed ID: 26740916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Multimodal Multilevel Neuroimaging Model for Investigating Brain Connectome Development.
Hu Y; Zeydabadinezhad M; Li L; Guo Y
J Am Stat Assoc; 2022; 117(539):1134-1148. PubMed ID: 36204347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Topological Filtering of Dynamic Functional Brain Networks Unfolds Informative Chronnectomics: A Novel Data-Driven Thresholding Scheme Based on Orthogonal Minimal Spanning Trees (OMSTs).
Dimitriadis SI; Salis C; Tarnanas I; Linden DE
Front Neuroinform; 2017; 11():28. PubMed ID: 28491032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sparse Estimation of Resting-State Effective Connectivity From fMRI Cross-Spectra.
Lennartz C; Schiefer J; Rotter S; Hennig J; LeVan P
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():287. PubMed ID: 29867310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of functional networks in resting state fMRI data using adaptive sparse representation and affinity propagation clustering.
Li X; Wang H
Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():383. PubMed ID: 26528123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Node Identification Using Inter-Regional Correlation Analysis for Mapping Detailed Connections in Resting State Networks.
Sohn WS; Lee TY; Yoo K; Kim M; Yun JY; Hur JW; Yoon YB; Seo SW; Na DL; Jeong Y; Kwon JS
Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():238. PubMed ID: 28507502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel joint sparse partial correlation method for estimating group functional networks.
Liang X; Connelly A; Calamante F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Mar; 37(3):1162-77. PubMed ID: 26859311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation-Weighted Sparse Group Representation for Brain Network Construction in MCI Classification.
Yu R; Zhang H; An L; Chen X; Wei Z; Shen D
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2016 Oct; 9900():37-45. PubMed ID: 28642938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revisiting correlation-based functional connectivity and its relationship with structural connectivity.
Liégeois R; Santos A; Matta V; Van De Ville D; Sayed AH
Netw Neurosci; 2020; 4(4):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 33409438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On Penalty Parameter Selection for Estimating Network Models.
Wysocki AC; Rhemtulla M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(2):288-302. PubMed ID: 31672065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
